The Importance of Multiple 14C Dates from Significant Archaeological Contexts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Problems remain in radiocarbon sample selection, ad hoc application of dates to archaeological features, and lack of acknowledgment that multiple dates for single contexts are needed to construct chronological frameworks.
“but problems remain in sample selection (Dee et al. 2012), the ad hoc application of dates to archaeological features, and the lack of acknowledgment that multiple dates for single contexts are needed in order to construct chronological frameworks (Levine and Stanish 2014).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Levine and Stanish 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marsh, E. J., Bruno, M. C., Fritz, S. C., Baker, P., Capriles, J. M., & Hastorf, C. A. (2018) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2018.16 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“…and Buchez 2002), but problems remain in sample selection (Dee et al. 2012), the ad hoc application of dates to archaeological features, and the lack of acknowledgment that multiple dates for single contexts are needed in order to construct chronological frameworks (Levine and Stanish 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Levine, A., & Stanish, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levine, Abigail
- ORCID
- Stanish, Charles
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
- Published
- 2013-06-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 824-836
- ISSN
- 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7764
- OpenAlex
- W2474600712
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- radiocarbon dating, sample size, dating uncertainty, prehistory, social evolution, evolutionary anthropology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
