The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations
Open accessAbstract
Free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations show considerable promise for applications ranging from drug discovery to prediction of physical properties and structure-function studies. But these calculations are still difficult and tedious to analyze, and best practices for analysis are not well defined or propagated. Essentially, each group analyzing these calculations needs to decide how to conduct the analysis and, usually, develop its own analysis tools. Here, we review and recommend best practices for analysis yielding reliable free energies from molecular simulations. Additionally, we provide a Python tool, alchemical-analysis.py, freely available on GitHub as part of the pymbar package (located at http://github.com/choderalab/pymbar), that implements the analysis practices reviewed here for several reference simulation packages, which can be adapted to handle data from other packages. Both this review and the tool covers analysis of alchemical calculations generally, including free energy estimates via both thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation-based estimators. Our Python tool also handles output from multiple types of free energy calculations, including expanded ensemble and Hamiltonian replica exchange, as well as standard fixed ensemble calculations. We also survey a range of statistical and graphical ways of assessing the quality of the data and free energy estimates, and provide prototypes of these in our tool. We hope this tool and discussion will serve as a foundation for more standardization of and agreement on best practices for analysis of free energy calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit
Pronk, S., Páll, S., Schulz, R., Larsson, P., Bjelkmar, P., Apostolov, R., Shirts, M. R., Smith, J. C., Kasson, P. M., van der Spoel, D., et al. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 · Cited by 7,473
Self-citationTHE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method
Kumar, S., Rosenberg, J. M., Bouzida, D., Swendsen, R. H., & Kollman, P. A. (1992) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540130812 · Cited by 6,808
Understanding Molecular Simulation
Frenkel, D., Smit, B., Tobochnik, J., McKay, S. R., & Christian, W. (1997) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4822570 · Cited by 5,395
Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications
Frenkel, D., Smit, B., & Ratner, M. A. (1997) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881812 · Cited by 5,059
Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures
Kirkwood, J. G. (1935) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1749657 · Cited by 3,454
High-Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases
Zwanzig, R. W. (1954) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1740409 · Cited by 3,066
Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data
Bennett, C. H. (1976) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4 · Cited by 2,755
University of California, San Francisco
(1974) · Medical History · doi:10.1017/s0025727300019682 · Cited by 2,222
Understanding Molecular Simulation
(2002) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-267351-1.x5000-7 · Cited by 2,042
Cited by
Antidepressant drugs act by directly binding to TRKB neurotrophin receptors
Casarotto, P. C., Girych, M., Fred, S. M., Kovaleva, V., Moliner, R., Enkavi, G., Biojone, C., Cannarozzo, C., Sahu, M. P., Kaurinkoski, K., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.034 · Cited by 663
Assessment of Binding Affinity via Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations
Kuhn, M., Firth-Clark, S., Tosco, P., Mey, A. S. J. S., Mackey, M., & Michel, J. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00165 · Cited by 222
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184
“111,129,130 Significant improvements can often be achieved by coupling Umbrella sampling with H-REMD allowing exchanges of sampled states between separate U.S. windows.”
BackgroundPredictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Aldeghi, M., Heifetz, A., Bodkin, M. J., Knapp, S., & Biggin, P. C. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11467 · Cited by 177
Structural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules
Jiang, W., Wijerathne, T. D., Zhang, H., Lin, Y.-C., Jo, S., Im, W., Lacroix, J. J., & Luo, Y. L. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2310933120 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Klimovich, P. V., Shirts, M. R., & Mobley, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Published
- 2015-03-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 397-411
- ISSN
- 0920-654X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4951
- OpenAlex
- W2063206968
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 37.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9
- The paper
- Klimovich, P. V., Shirts, M. R., & Mobley, D. L. (2015). Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.