Problematic Facebook Use in Adolescents: Associations with Parental Attachment and Alienation to Peers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Problematic internet use has been correlated with both anxious and avoidant attachment.
“Problematic internet use has been correlated with both being anxious (Assunção et al. 2017;Mazaheri Nejadfard and Hosseinsabet 2017;Reiner et al. 2017;Savcı and Aysan 2016;Shin et al. 2011) and having avoidant attachment (Kozan et al. 2016;Odacı and Çıkrıkçı 2014;Shin et al. 2011).”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. 2017
Children's security in their relationship with parents is central to their Internet use.
“Children's security in their relationship with parents is central to their Internet use (Assunção et al. 2017).”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. 2017
The study only used self-report instruments which are susceptible to response and social desirability biases.
“The study only used self-report instruments which are susceptible to response and social desirability biases”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. (2017)
The sample did not include the whole age range of adolescence.
“The sample did not include the whole age range of adolescence.”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. (2017)
Anxiously attached individuals use Facebook intensely as a means to develop and maintain their relationships.
“Thus, they use Facebook intensely (i) as a means to develop and maintain their relationships (Andangsari et al. 2013;Assunção et al. 2017;Estévez et al. 2017;Liu et al. 2013;Longua Peterson et al. 2017;Rao and Madan 2012;Rom and Alfasi 2014;)”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. 2017
Secure relationships with parents enable securely attached individuals to feel safe in sharing feelings with others and to construct secure relationships.
“This enables them to feel safe in sharing feelings with others and to construct secure relationships (Assunção et al. 2017).”
From Addiction to Social Media and Attachment Styles: A Systematic Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Assunção et al. 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Assunção, R. S., Costa, P., Tagliabue, S., & Mena Matos, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- ORCID
- Tagliabue, Semira
- Venue
- Journal of Child and Family Studies
- Published
- 2017-06-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2990-2998
- ISSN
- 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2843
- OpenAlex
- W2624998616
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PT) (SFRH/BD/79431/2011)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- problematic Facebook use, adolescents, parental attachment, peer alienation, social networking sites, mediation, gender differences, parent-adolescent relationships, computer-mediated communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
