Helicopter parenting and adjustment outcomes in young adulthood: a consideration of the mediating roles of mastery and self-regulation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High helicopter parenting was linked to high depression.
“High helicopter parenting was linked to high depression”
From A Systematic Review of “Helicopter Parenting” and Its Relationship With Anxiety and Depression (2022) · cites this paper as Moilanen and Lynn Manuel (2019)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Moilanen, K. L., & Lynn Manuel, M.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moilanen, Kristin L.
- ORCID
- Moilanen, Kristin L.
- Venue
- Journal of Child and Family Studies
- Published
- 2019-05-23
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2145-2158
- ISSN
- 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2843
- OpenAlex
- W2946018494
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- West Virginia University (None)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- helicopter parenting, emerging adulthood, personal mastery, self-regulation, social competence, prosocial behavior, depression, substance use, parental acceptance, psychological control, corporate control, parenting practices, mediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
