The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies
Open accessAbstract
We review different aspects of the simulation of spiking neural networks. We start by reviewing the different types of simulation strategies and algorithms that are currently implemented. We next review the precision of those simulation strategies, in particular in cases where plasticity depends on the exact timing of the spikes. We overview different simulators and simulation environments presently available (restricted to those freely available, open source and documented). For each simulation tool, its advantages and pitfalls are reviewed, with an aim to allow the reader to identify which simulator is appropriate for a given task. Finally, we provide a series of benchmark simulations of different types of networks of spiking neurons, including Hodgkin–Huxley type, integrate-and-fire models, interacting with current-based or conductance-based synapses, using clock-driven or event-driven integration strategies. The same set of models are implemented on the different simulators, and the codes are made available. The ultimate goal of this review is to provide a resource to facilitate identifying the appropriate integration strategy and simulation tool to use for a given modeling problem related to spiking neural networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simple model of spiking neurons
Izhikevich, E. M. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.820440 · Cited by 4,828
Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast
Abbott, L. F., & Nelson, S. B. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81453 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 1×
“Some models of spike-timing dependent plasticity (with linear interactions between pairs of spikes) can also be simulated in this way (see e.g. Abbott and Nelson 2000).”
Differential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons
Markram, H., Wang, Y., & Tsodyks, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5323 · Cited by 1,102
Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., Roth, A., & Sakmann, B. (1997) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022031 · Cited by 960
Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus
Traub, R. D., & Miles, R. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895401 · Cited by 802
Heterogeneity in the pyramidal network of the medial prefrontal cortex
Wang, Y., Markram, H., Goodman, P. H., Berger, T. K., Ma, J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1670 · Cited by 503
Self-citationLearning Input Correlations through Nonlinear Temporally Asymmetric Hebbian Plasticity
Gütig, R., Aharonov, R., Rotter, S., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-09-03697.2003 · Cited by 401
Parallel network simulations with NEURON
Migliore, M., Cannia, C., Lytton, W. W., Markram, H., & Hines, M. L. (2006) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-006-7949-5 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator
Stimberg, M., Brette, R., & Goodman, D. F. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47314 · Cited by 749
Self-citationPyNN: a common interface for neuronal network simulators
Davison, A. P. (2008) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/neuro.11.011.2008 · Cited by 607
Self-citationKasabov, N. K. (2014) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.01.006 · Cited by 454
Neural networks: An overview of early research, current frameworks and new challenges
Prieto, A., Prieto, B., Ortigosa, E. M., Ros, E., Pelayo, F., Ortega, J., & Rojas, I. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.06.014 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Brette, R., Rudolph, M., Carnevale, T., Hines, M., Beeman, D., Bower, J. M., Diesmann, M., Morrison, A., Goodman, P. H., Harris, F. C., Zirpe, M., Natschläger, T., Pecevski, D., Ermentrout, B., Djurfeldt, M., Lansner, A., Rochel, O., Vieville, T., Muller, E., Davison, A. P., El Boustani, S., & Destexhe, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-07-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-398
- ISSN
- 0929-5313 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6873
- OpenAlex
- W2043679829
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10827-007-0038-6
- The paper
- Brette, R., Rudolph, M., Carnevale, T., Hines, M., Beeman, D., Bower, J. M., Diesmann, M., Morrison, A., Goodman, P. H., Harris, F. C., Zirpe, M., Natschläger, T., Pecevski, D., Ermentrout, B., Djurfeldt, M., Lansner, A., Rochel, O., Vieville, T., Muller, E., . . . Destexhe, A. (2007). Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0038-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.