Systems level circuit model of C. elegans undulatory locomotion: mathematical modeling and molecular genetics
Open accessAbstract
To establish the relationship between locomotory behavior and dynamics of neural circuits in the nematode C. elegans we combined molecular and theoretical approaches. In particular, we quantitatively analyzed the motion of C. elegans with defective synaptic GABA and acetylcholine transmission, defective muscle calcium signaling, and defective muscles and cuticle structures, and compared the data with our systems level circuit model. The major experimental findings are: (1) anterior-to-posterior gradients of body bending flex for almost all strains both for forward and backward motion, and for neuronal mutants, also analogous weak gradients of undulatory frequency, (2) existence of some form of neuromuscular (stretch receptor) feedback, (3) invariance of neuromuscular wavelength, (4) biphasic dependence of frequency on synaptic signaling, and (5) decrease of frequency with increase of the muscle time constant. Based on (1) we hypothesize that the Central Pattern Generator (CPG) is located in the head both for forward and backward motion. Points (1) and (2) are the starting assumptions for our theoretical model, whose dynamical patterns are qualitatively insensitive to the details of the CPG design if stretch receptor feedback is sufficiently strong and slow. The model reveals that stretch receptor coupling in the body wall is critical for generation of the neuromuscular wave. Our model agrees with our behavioral data (3), (4), and (5), and with other pertinent published data, e.g., that frequency is an increasing function of muscle gap-junction coupling.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 21× · see citing works
“We include mechanosensory feedback in our head network model following suggestions that a pair of head interneurons SAA may contain stretch receptors on their long dendrites (White et al, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialActive Currents Regulate Sensitivity and Dynamic Range in C. elegans Neurons
Goodman, M. B., Hall, D. H., Avery, L., & Lockery, S. R. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81014-4 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
A Simulation Model of the Locomotion Controllers for the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Bryden, J., & Cohen, N. (2004) · From Animals to Animats 8 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3122.003.0024 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This mechanism was theoretically considered by Bryden and Cohen (2004).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chalfie M, White J (1988). The Nervous System. In: Wood WB, editor. The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 337-391.
- Chen BL, Hall DH, Chklovskii DB (2006). Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 4723-4728.
- Gray JM, Hill JJ, Bargmann CI (2005). A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 3184-3191.
- Moerman DG, Fire A (1997). Muscle: Structure, Function, and Development. In: Riddle DL et al. editors. C. elegans II. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 417-470.
- Strogatz SH (1994). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos . Westview Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of central pattern generators and rhythmic behaviours
Katz, P. S. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0057 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model
Boyle, J. H., Berri, S., & Cohen, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00010 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“Indeed, the stretch receptor hypothesis is widely recognized as an attractive and plausible conjecture (Riddle et al., 1997; Tavernarakis et al., 1997; Bryden and Cohen, 2004, 2008; O’Hagan and Chalfie, 2005; Karbowski et al., 2008) and forms the basis of our model.”
BackgroundMethodSwimming at low Reynolds number: a beginners guide to undulatory locomotion
Cohen, N., & Boyle, J. H. (2010) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510903268381 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Backholm, M., Ryu, W. S., & Dalnoki-Veress, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219965110 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Distributed rhythm generators underlie Caenorhabditis elegans forward locomotion
Fouad, A. D., Teng, S., Mark, J. R., Liu, A., Alvarez-Illera, P., Ji, H., Du, A., Bhirgoo, P. D., Cornblath, E., Guan, S. A., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.29913 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0374 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Olivares, E. O., Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00036 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Until now, only the first of these two hypotheses had been demonstrated using neuroanatomically-grounded computational models (Boyle et al., 2012, 2008; Bryden & Cohen, 2008; Deng et al., 2016; Karbowski et al., 2008; Kunert et al., 2017; Niebur & Erdös, 1991, 1993; Sakata & Shingai, 2004; Wen et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe whole worm: brain–body–environment models of C. elegans
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.005 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karbowski, J., Schindelman, G., Cronin, C. J., Seah, A., & Sternberg, P. W.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karbowski, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-276
- ISSN
- 0929-5313 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6873
- OpenAlex
- W1988214762
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- Caenorhabditis elegans, undulatory locomotion, central pattern generator, body wall muscle, electrical coupling, circuit model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Locomotion, Mechanoreceptors, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Motor Activity, Mutation, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Caenorhabditis elegans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review