Cited by 26Robotic Locomotion and ControlNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchMotor Control and Adaptation

A Simulation Model of the Locomotion Controllers for the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Bryden, John, Cohen, Netta·2004·From Animals to Animats 8

Abstract

This paper presents a simple yet biologicallygrounded \nmodel of the C. elegans neural circuit \nfor forward locomotive control. The model considers \na limited subset of the C. elegans nervous \nsystem, within a minimal two-dimensional environment. \nDespite its reductionist approach, this \nmodel is sufficiently rich to generate patterns of \nundulations that are reminiscent of the biological \nworm’s behaviour and qualitatively similar to \npatterns which have been shown to generate locomotion \nin a model of a richer physical environment. \nInterestingly, and contrary to conventional \nwisdom about neural circuits for motor control, \nour results are consistent with the conjecture that \nthe worm may be relying on feedback from the \nshape of its body to generate undulations that \npropel it forward or backward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/3122.003.0024

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bryden, J. (2003). A simulation model of the locomotion controllers for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Master's thesis, University of Leeds.
  2. Chalfie, M., Sulston, J., White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., and Brenner, S. (1985). The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans . Journal of Neuroscience , 5(4):956-964.
  3. Chalfie, M. and White, J. (1988). The nervous system. In Wood, W., (Ed.), The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  4. Ferr´ ee, T. C. and Lockery, S. R. (1998). Chemotaxis control by liner recurrent networks. Journal of Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research , pages 373-377.
  5. Ferr´ ee, T. C. and Lockery, S. R. (1999). Computational rules for chemotaxis in the nematode C. elegans . Journal of Computational Neuroscience , 6:263-277.
  6. Gray, L. (1950). The kinetics of locomotion of the grass snake. Journal of Experimental Biology , 26:354.
  7. Gray, L. (1953). Undulatory propulsion. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science , 94:551.
  8. Ijspeert, A. (2001). A connectionist central pattern generator for the aquatic and terrestrial gaits of a simulated salamander. Biological Cybernetics , 84(5):331-348.
  9. Ijspeert, A., Hallam, J., and Willshaw, D. (1999). Evolving swimming controllers for a simulated lamprey with inspiration from neurobiology. Adaptive Behavior , 7(2):151-172.
  10. Marder, E. and Calabrese, R. (1996). Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. Physiological Reviews , 76(3):687-717.
  11. Niebur, E. and Erd¨ os, P. (1991). Theory of the locomotion of nematodes. Biophysical Journal , 60:11321146.
  12. Niebur, E. and Erd¨ os, P. (1993). Modeling locomotion and its neural control in nematodes. Comments on Theoretical Biology , 3(2):109-139.
  13. White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., and Brenner, S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode c.elegans (the mind of a worm). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London. Series B, Biological Sciences , 314(1165):1-34.
  14. Wicks, S., Roehrig, C., and Rankin, C. (1996). A dynamic network simulation of the nematode tap withdrawal circuit: Predictions concerning synaptic function using behavioral criteria. Journal of Neuroscience , 16:4017-4031.
  15. Wood, W. (1988). Introduction to C. elegans biology. In Wood, W., (Ed.), The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryden, J., & Cohen, N.
Affiliations
  • White Rose University Consortium (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
From Animals to Animats 8
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2004-06-25
Pages
183-192
OpenAlex
W1608188033
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.34
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, locomotion control, neural circuit model, forward locomotion, undulatory locomotion, motor control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review