Cited by 131Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomySpecies Distribution and Climate Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe

Kuussaari, Mikko, Heliölä, Janne, Pöyry, Juha, Saarinen, Kimmo·2007·Journal of Insect Conservation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10841-006-9052-7

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Aro JE (1900). Suomen perhoset. Otava, Helsinki
  2. Hietala-Koivu R (2003) Lost field margins. A study of landscape change in four case areas in Finland between 1954 and 1998. PhD Thesis, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  3. Hyönteiskartoitus/Insektkartering 81 (1996) Results of the mapping in 1996 of the distribution of 21 insect species in Finland. Sahlbergia 3:63–75
  4. Kaisila J (1962). Immigration und Expansion der Lepidopteren in Finnland in den Jahren 1869–1960. Acta Entomol Fen 18:1–452
  5. Kuussaari M, Pöyry J, Lundsten K-E (2000). Butterfly monitoring in agricultural landscapes: the monitoring method and first year’s results [in Finnish with an English summary]. Baptria 25:44–56
  6. Marttila O, Haahtela T, Aarnio H, Ojalainen P (1992). Päiväperhosopas. Kirjayhtymä Oy, Helsinki
  7. Marttila O, Saarinen K, Haahtela T, Aarnio H, Ojalainen P (2000). Päiväperhosopas. Suomi ja lähialueet. Tammi, Helsinki
  8. Mikkola K (1979). Vanishing and declining species of Finnish Lepidoptera. Notulae Entomol 59:1–9
  9. Pitkänen M, Kuussaari M, Pöyry J (2001). Butterflies. In: Pitkänen M, Tiainen J (eds) Biodiversity of agricultural landscapes in Finland. BirdLife Finland Conservation Series No. 3. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, pp 51–68
  10. Punttila P, Virkkala R, Auvinen A-P, Toivonen H, Kaipiainen H, Söderman G, Mannerkoski I (2005). Metsät [Forests]. In: Hildén M, Auvinen A-P, Primmer E (eds) Suomen biodiversiteettiohjelman arviointi [English summary: Evaluation of the Finnish national action plan for biodiversity]. Suomen ympäristö 770. Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki, pp 37–51
  11. Valle KJ (1935). Suomen eläimet 2. Suurperhoset I. Päiväperhoset. Werner Söderström Oy, Porvoo

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–131 of 131

Metadata

Authors
Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Pöyry, J., & Saarinen, K.
Affiliations
Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
Corresponding author
Kuussaari, Mikko
Venue
Journal of Insect Conservation
Published
2007-02-06
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
351-366
ISSN
  • 1366-638X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9753
OpenAlex
W2079297966
Cited by
131
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Insect Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
semi-natural grasslands, forest edge, land use change, habitat occupancy, species decline, larval host plants, overwintering stage, modern forestry, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review