The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric materials
Open accessAbstract
Lead zirconate titanate (PZT) based piezoelectric materials are well known for their excellent piezoelectric properties. However, considering the toxicity of lead and its compounds, there is a general awareness for the development of environmental friendly lead-free materials as evidenced from the legislation passed by the European Union in this effect. Several classes of materials are now being considered as potentially attractive alternatives to PZTs for specific applications. In this paper, attempts have been made to review the recent developments on lead-free piezo materials emphasizing on their preparation, structure–property correlation, etc. In this context, perovskite systems such as bismuth sodium titanate, alkali niobates (ANbO 3 ), etc. and non-perovskites such as bismuth layer-structured ferroelectrics are reviewed in detail. From the above study, it is concluded that some lead-free compositions show stable piezoelectric responses even though they do not match the overall performance of PZT. This has been the stimulant for growing research on this subject. This topic is of current interest to the researchers worldwide as evidenced from the large number of research publications. This has motivated us to come out with a review article with a view that it would give further impetus to the researchers already working in this area and also draw the attention of the others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hammock, M. L., Chortos, A., Tee, B. C. ‐., Tok, J. B. ‐., & Bao, Z. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302240 · Cited by 2,396
Jo, W., Dittmer, R., Acosta, M., Zang, J., Groh, C., Sapper, E., Wang, K., & Rödel, J. (2012) · Journal of Electroceramics · doi:10.1007/s10832-012-9742-3 · Cited by 964
Safaei, M., Sodano, H. A., & Anton, S. R. (2019) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ab36e4 · Cited by 874
“Bryant and Garcia in 2011 [329, 330] expanded upon the work presented by Tan and Panda [326] by developing an aeroelastic flutter energy harvester containing a rigid flap connected to a piezoelectric cantilever harvester through a ball bearing revolute joint (figure 9(b)).”
BackgroundInfluentialA review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: Available designs and future perspective
Sharma, S., Kiran, R., Azad, P., & Vaish, R. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115272 · Cited by 194
Review of Hybrid Materials Based on Polyhydroxyalkanoates for Tissue Engineering Applications
Pryadko, A., Surmeneva, M. A., & Surmenev, R. A. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13111738 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Panda, P. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5049-5062
- ISSN
- 0022-2461 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4803
- OpenAlex
- W2144804459
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0
- The paper
- Panda, P. K. (2009). Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric materials. Journal of Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.