The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance
Open accessAbstract
Conductive inks based on graphite and carbon black are used in a host of applications including energy storage, energy harvesting, electrochemical sensors and printed heaters. This requires accurate control of electrical properties tailored to the application; ink formulation is a fundamental element of this. Data on how formulation relates to properties have tended to apply to only single types of conductor at any time, with data on mixed types of carbon only empirical thus far. Therefore, screen printable carbon inks with differing graphite, carbon black and vinyl polymer content were formulated and printed to establish the effect on rheology, deposition and conductivity. The study found that at a higher total carbon loading ink of 29.4% by mass, optimal conductivity (0.029 Ω cm) was achieved at a graphite to carbon black ratio of 2.6 to 1. For a lower total carbon loading (21.7 mass %), this ratio was reduced to 1.8 to 1. Formulation affected viscosity and hence ink transfer and also surface roughness due to retention of features from the screen printing mesh and the inherent roughness of the carbon components, as well as the ability of features to be reproduced consistently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technologies for Printing Sensors and Electronics Over Large Flexible Substrates: A Review
Khan, S., Lorenzelli, L., & Dahiya, R. S. (2015) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2014.2375203 · Cited by 1,225
Cited by
Carbon-based materials for stable, cheaper and large-scale processable perovskite solar cells
Fagiolari, L., & Bella, F. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee02115a · Cited by 355
Low-temperature carbon-based electrodes in perovskite solar cells
Bogachuk, D., Zouhair, S., Wojciechowski, K., Yang, B., Babu, V., Wagner, L., Xu, B., Lim, J., Mastroianni, S., Pettersson, H., et al. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02175j · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, C., Al-Ahmadi, A., Potts, S.-J., Claypole, T., & Deganello, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science
- Published
- 2017-04-27
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9520-9530
- ISSN
- 0022-2461 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4803
- OpenAlex
- W2609498307
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10853-017-1114-6
- The paper
- Phillips, C., Al-Ahmadi, A., Potts, S.-J., Claypole, T., & Deganello, D. (2017). The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance. Journal of Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1114-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.