The thermal conductivity of defected copper at finite temperatures
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity are interrelated by the Wiedemann-Franz Law, which holds for defected copper.
“Since electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity, κ , are interrelated by the Wiedemann-Franz Law, which holds for defected copper [41]”
From A facility for thermo-mechanical characterization of fusion magnet materials during cryogenic ion irradiation (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Ye, X. B., He, Z. H., & Pan, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pan, B. C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4453-4463
- ISSN
- 0022-2461 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4803
- OpenAlex
- W2993933720
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11275191)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
- Keywords
- copper, thermal conductivity, point defects, vacancies, self-interstitials, tungsten impurity, electron heat transport, radiation damage, Wiedemann-Franz law, finite temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
