Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessing two-way interactions between cells and inorganic nanoparticles

Cristallini, C., Barbani, N., Bianchi, S., Maltinti, S., Baldassare, A., Ishak, R., Onor, M., Ambrosio, L., Castelvetro, V., Cascone, M. G.·2020·Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Abstract

A safe and effective use of nanoparticles in biology and medicine requires a thorough understanding, down to the molecular level, of how nanoparticles interact with cells in the physiological environment. This study evaluated the two-way interaction between inorganic nanomaterials (INMs) and cells from A549 human lung carcinoma cell line. The interaction between silica and zinc oxide INMs and cells was investigated using both standard methods and advanced characterization techniques. The effect of INMs on cell properties was evaluated in terms of cell viability, chemical modifications, and volume changes. The effect of cells and culture medium on INMs was evaluated using dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). No cytotoxic effect was detected in the case of silicon oxide INMs, while for high doses of zinc oxide INMs a reduction of cell survival was observed. Also, increased cell volume was recorded after 24 h incubation of cells with zinc oxide INMs. A better dimensional homogeneity and colloidal stability was observed by DLS for silicon oxide INMs than for zinc oxide INMs. SEM-EDS analysis showed the effectiveness of the adopted dispersion procedure and confirmed in the case of zinc oxide INMs the presence of residual substance…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10856-019-6328-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:751–60. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Duncan R. Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:688–701. · DOI
  3. Ferrari M. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:161–71. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles in medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;83:761–9. · DOI
  5. Tang L, Cheng J. Nonporous silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine application. Nano Today 2013;8:290–312. · DOI
  6. Zhang H, Xia JY, Pang X, Zhao M, Wang B, Yang L et al. Magnetic nanoparticle-loaded electrospun polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C. 2017;73:537–43. · DOI
  7. Panchal RG. Novel therapeutic strategies to selectively kill cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;55:247–52. · DOI
  8. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–7. · DOI · Paper page
  9. McNeil SE. Nanotechnology for the biologist. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78:585–94. · DOI
  10. Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock AK, Zweck A. The emerging nanomedicine landscape. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1211–7. · DOI
  11. Hanley C, Layne J, Punnoose A, Reddy KM, Coombs I, Coombs A et al. Preferential killing of cancer cells and activated human T cells using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2008;19:295103–13. · DOI
  12. Wang H, Wingett D, Engelhard MH, Feris K, Reddy KM, Turner P et al. Fluorescent dye encapsulated ZnO particles with cell specific toxicity for potential use in biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20:11–22. · DOI
  13. Zhang Y, Nayak Y, Tapas R, Hong H, Cai W. Biomedical Applications of Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:1633–45. · DOI
  14. Accomasso L, Cristallini C, Giachino C. Risk assessment and risk minimization in nanomedicine: a need for predictive, alternative, and 3Rs strategies. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:art 228. · DOI
  15. Zhang Y, Nguyen KC, Lefebvre DE, Shwed PS, Crosthwait J, Bondy GS et al. Critical experimental parameters related to the cytotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16:24–40.
  16. Gojova A, Guo B, Kota RS, Rutledge JC, Kennedy IM, Barakat AI. Induction of inflammation in vascular endothelial cells by metal oxide nanoparticles: effect of particle composition. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:403–9. · DOI
  17. Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, Punnoose A. Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90:2139021–3.
  18. Gil F, Pla A, Hernandez AF, Mercado JM, Mendez F. A fatal case following exposure to zinc chloride and hexachloroethane from a smoke bomb in a fire simulation at a school. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46:563–5. · DOI
  19. Bengalli R, Gualtieri M, Capasso L, Urani C, Camatini M. Impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on an in vitro model of the human air-blood barrier. Toxicol Lett. 2017;279:22–32. · DOI
  20. Sahu D, Kannan GM, Vijayaraghavan R. Size-dependent effect of zinc oxide on toxicity and inflammatory potential of human monocytes. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2014;77:177–91. · DOI
  21. Wang B, Zhang J, Chen C, Xu G, Qin X, Hong Y et al. The size of zinc oxide nanoparticles controls its toxicity through impairing autophagic flux in A549 lung epithelial cells. Toxicol Lett. 2018;285:51–9. · DOI
  22. Kim I-Y, Joachim E, Choi H, Kim K. Toxicity of Silica nanoparticles depends on size, dose, and cell type. Nanomedicine. 2015;11:1407–16. · DOI
  23. Song MK, HS Lee HS, Choi HS, Shin CY, Kim YJ, Park YK et al. Octanal-induced inflammatory responses in cells relevant for lung toxicity: expression and release of cytokines in A549 human alveolar cells. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33:710–21. · DOI
  24. Totaro S, Cotogno G, Rasmussen K, Pianella F, Roncaglia M, Olsson H et al. The JRC nanomaterials repository: a unique facility providing representative test materials for nanoEHS research. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;81:334–40. · DOI
  25. Miller LM, Dumas P. From structure to cellular mechanism with infrared microspectroscopy. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 2010;20:649–56. · DOI
  26. Singh C et al. NM-series of representative manufactured nanomaterials—zinc oxide NM-110, NM-111, NM-112, NM-113: characterisation and test item preparation, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2011. p. 141. EUR—Scientific and Technical Research series—ISSN 1831-9424 (online), ISSN 1018-5593 (print). https://doi.org/10.2787/55008. · DOI
  27. Rama Narsimha Reddy A, Srividya L. Evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles using human cell lines. J Toxicol Risk Assess. 2018;4:009.
  28. Ng CT, Yong LQ, Hande, Ong CN, Yu LE, Bay BH et al. Zinc oxide nanoprtcles exhibit cytotoxicity and genotoxicity through oxidative stress responses in human lung fibroblasts and Drosophila Melanogasters. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:1621–37. · DOI
  29. Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB et al. Physical-chemical aspects of protein corona: relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:2525–34. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ongena K, Das C, Smith JL, Gil S, Johnston G. Determining cell number during cell culture using the Scepter cell counter. J Vis Exp. 2010;45:e2204. · DOI
  31. Tahara M, Inoue T, Miyakura Y, Horie H, Yasuda Y, Fujii H et al. Cell diameter measurements obtained with a handheld cell counter could be used as a surrogate marker of G2/M arrest and apoptosis in colon cancer cell lines exposed to SN-38. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434:753–9. · DOI
  32. Varaprath S, Larson PS. Degradation of monophenylheptamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and 2,6-cis-diphenylhexamethylcycloterasiloxane in Londo Soil. J Polym Environ. 2002;10:119–31. · DOI
  33. Varaprath S, Salyers KL, Plotzke KP, Nanavati S. Identification of metabolites of octamethilcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) in rat urine. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27:1267–73.
  34. Song MK, Choi HS, Lee HS, Kim YJ, Park YK, Ryu JC. Analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression profiles highlights alterations in modulation of the MAPK pathway under octanal exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37:84–94. · DOI
  35. Mattson EC, Aboualizadeh E, Barabas ME, Stucky CL, Hirschmugl CJ. Opportunities for live cell FT-infrared imaging: macromolecule identification with 2D and 3D localization. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:22753–81. · DOI
  36. Lipiec E, Kowalska J, Lekki J, Wiechec A, Kwiatek WM. FTIR microspectroscopy in studies of DNA damage induced by proton microbeam in single PC-3 Cells. Acta Phys Pol A. 2012;2:506–9. · DOI
  37. Singh B, Gautam R, Kumor S, Vinaykumar BN, Nongthomba U, Nandi D et al. Application of vibrational microspectroscopy to biology and medicine. Curr Sci. 2012;102:232–44.
  38. Falahat R, Wiranowska M, Toomeya R, Alcantar N. ATR-FTIR analysis of spectral and biochemical changes in glioma cells induced by chlorotoxin. Vib Spectrosc. 2016;87:164–72. · DOI
  39. Mourant JR, Gibson RR, Johnson TM, Carpenter S, Short KW, Yamada YR et al. Methods for measuring the infrared spectra of biological cells. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:243–57. · DOI
  40. Mirzaei H, Darroudi M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: biological synthesis and biomedical applications. Ceram Int. 2017;43:907–14. · DOI
  41. Darroudi M, Sabouri Z, Oskuee RK, Zak AK, Kargar H, Hamid MHNA. Green chemistry approach for the synthesis of ZnO nanopowders and their cytotoxic effects. Ceram Int. 2014;40:4827–31. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Cristallini, C., Barbani, N., Bianchi, S., Maltinti, S., Baldassare, A., Ishak, R., Onor, M., Ambrosio, L., Castelvetro, V., & Cascone, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Published
2019-12-05
Volume
31
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0957-4530
  • 1573-4838
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing two-way interactions between cells and inorganic nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10856-019-6328-5
The paper
Cristallini, C., Barbani, N., Bianchi, S., Maltinti, S., Baldassare, A., Ishak, R., Onor, M., Ambrosio, L., Castelvetro, V., & Cascone, M. G. (2020). Assessing two-way interactions between cells and inorganic nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6328-5