Cited by 55Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesScience Education and Pedagogy

Elementary school teachers’ noticing of essential mathematical reasoning forms: justification and generalization

Melhuish, Kathleen, Thanheiser, Eva, Guyot, Layla·2020·Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Guyot, L.
Affiliations
  • Texas State University (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Melhuish, Kathleen
Venue
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Published
2018-06-16
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
35-67
ISSN
  • 1386-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1820
OpenAlex
W2808127062
Cited by
55
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1223074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
teacher noticing, mathematical justification, mathematical generalization, mathematical reasoning, primary school teachers, teacher self-assessment, teacher professional development, mathematics teaching practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review