The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction
Open accessAbstract
A new computer program, called SHIFTX2, is described which is capable of rapidly and accurately calculating diamagnetic (1)H, (13)C and (15)N chemical shifts from protein coordinate data. Compared to its predecessor (SHIFTX) and to other existing protein chemical shift prediction programs, SHIFTX2 is substantially more accurate (up to 26% better by correlation coefficient with an RMS error that is up to 3.3× smaller) than the next best performing program. It also provides significantly more coverage (up to 10% more), is significantly faster (up to 8.5×) and capable of calculating a wider variety of backbone and side chain chemical shifts (up to 6×) than many other shift predictors. In particular, SHIFTX2 is able to attain correlation coefficients between experimentally observed and predicted backbone chemical shifts of 0.9800 ((15)N), 0.9959 ((13)Cα), 0.9992 ((13)Cβ), 0.9676 ((13)C'), 0.9714 ((1)HN), 0.9744 ((1)Hα) and RMS errors of 1.1169, 0.4412, 0.5163, 0.5330, 0.1711, and 0.1231 ppm, respectively. The correlation between SHIFTX2's predicted and observed side chain chemical shifts is 0.9787 ((13)C) and 0.9482 ((1)H) with RMS errors of 0.9754 and 0.1723 ppm, respectively. SHIFTX2 is able to achieve such a high level of accuracy by using a large, high quality database of training proteins (>190), by utilizing advanced machine learning techniques, by incorporating many more features (χ(2) and χ(3) angles, solvent accessibility, H-bond geometry, pH, temperature), and by combining sequence-based with structure-based chemical shift prediction techniques. With this substantial improvement in accuracy we believe that SHIFTX2 will open the door to many long-anticipated applications of chemical shift prediction to protein structure determination, refinement and validation. SHIFTX2 is available both as a standalone program and as a web server ( http://www.shiftx2.ca ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Wiederstein, M., & Sippl, M. J. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm290 · Cited by 5,909
AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: Programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR
Laskowski, R., Rullmann, J. A., MacArthur, M., Kaptein, R., & Thornton, J. (1996) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/bf00228148 · Cited by 5,502
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Cited by
Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics
Granata, D., Camilloni, C., Vendruscolo, M., & Laio, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218350110 · Cited by 143
Finding Our Way in the Dark Proteome
Bhowmick, A., Brookes, D. H., Yost, S. R., Dyson, H. J., Forman-Kay, J. D., Gunter, D., Head-Gordon, M., Hura, G. L., Pande, V. S., Wemmer, D. E., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06543 · Cited by 128
Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · Cited by 85
How multisite phosphorylation impacts the conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins
Jin, F., & Gräter, F. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008939 · Cited by 77
Verkhivker, G. M., Agajanian, S., Hu, G., & Tao, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00136 · Cited by 76
The allosteric communication pathways in KIX domain of CBP
Palazzesi, F., Barducci, A., Tollinger, M., & Parrinello, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313548110 · Cited by 62
Artificial intelligence guided conformational mining of intrinsically disordered proteins
Gupta, A., Dey, S., Hicks, A., & Zhou, H.-X. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03562-y · Cited by 56
Automatic structure-based NMR methyl resonance assignment in large proteins
Pritišanac, I., Würz, J. M., Alderson, T. R., & Güntert, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12837-8 · Cited by 46
Gavriel, R., Nadav‐Tsubery, M., Glick, Y., Yarmolenko, A., Kofman, R., Keinan‐Adamsky, K., Berman, A., Mass, T., & Goobes, G. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707321 · Cited by 22
Characterization of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B Inhibition by Chlorogenic Acid and Cichoric Acid
Lipchock, J. M., Hendrickson, H. P., Douglas, B. B., Bird, K. E., Ginther, P. S., Rivalta, I., Ten, N. S., Batista, V. S., & Loria, J. P. (2017) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01025 · Cited by 20
Mukherjee, S., Pantelopulos, G. A., & Voelz, V. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31631 · Cited by 20
Rational design of 19F NMR labelling sites to probe protein structure and interactions
Streit, J. O., Chan, S. H. S., Daya, S., & Christodoulou, J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59105-6 · Cited by 17
Bishop, A. C., Torres-Montalvo, G., Kotaru, S., Mimun, K., & Wand, A. J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37219-z · Cited by 16
Mustafi, S. M., Brecher, M., Zhang, J., Li, H., Lemaster, D. M., & Hernández, G. (2014) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20131429 · Cited by 15
Lesovoy, D., Roshchin, K., Sala, B. M., Sandalova, T., Achour, A., Agback, T., Orekhov, V., & Agback, P. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.07.637034 · Cited by 6
Lesovoy, D., Roshchin, K., Sala, B. M., Sandalova, T., Achour, A., Agback, T., Agback, P., & Orekhov, V. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26188917 · Cited by 6
The impact of glycosylation on the conformational ensembles of β-, δ-, and γ-sarcoglycans
Fazelpour, E., Cook, G. A., & McCullagh, M. (2026) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2026.04.018
The Impact of Glycosylation on the Conformational Ensembles of β -, δ -, and γ Sarcoglycans
Fazelpour, E., Cook, G. A., & McCullagh, M. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.13.699269
Fowler, N. J., Albalwi, M. F., Lee, S., Hounslow, A. M., & Williamson, M. P. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.29.505644
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, B., Liu, Y., Ginzinger, S. W., & Wishart, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR
- Published
- 2011-03-30
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-57
- ISSN
- 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5001
- OpenAlex
- W2029120587
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
