Cited by 0Protein Structure and DynamicsGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchMuscle Physiology and Disorders

The impact of glycosylation on the conformational ensembles of β-, δ-, and γ-sarcoglycans

Open access
Fazelpour, Elham, Cook, Gabriel A., McCullagh, Martin·2026·Biophysical Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Glycosylation is a pivotal post-translational modification that influences protein folding, stability, and interactions with direct implications for muscular dystrophy pathogenesis and emerging gene therapies. Sarcoglycans (SGs), β, δ, γ, and α subunits of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), contain essential N-linked glycosylation sites, and mutations disrupt glycan attachment, destabilize the complex, and cause limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. However, the structural consequences of SG glycosylation remain poorly defined due to the absence of experimental SG complex structures. Here, we use homology modeling, AlphaFold predictions, and all-atom molecular-dynamics simulations to probe how N-linked glycans reshape the conformational ensembles of β-, δ-, and γ-SG monomers and the β-δ-γ heterotrimer core. We find that glycosylation increases flexibility and conformational heterogeneity in isolated monomers but reinforces a compact, stabilized architecture in the heterotrimer. Contact-map and clustering analyses show that glycans redistribute local residue interactions while preserving global trimer organization, suggesting a context-dependent role in destabilizing monomers yet reinforcing complex stability. These findings provide the first atomistic insight into how glycosylation primes SGs for assembly and may explain why mutations at glycosylation sites disrupt complex integrity and drive muscular dystrophy phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2026.04.018

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fazelpour, E., Cook, G. A., & McCullagh, M.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
McCullagh, Martin
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-06
Volume
125
Issue
11
Pages
2657-2669
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7155102384
Cited by
0
References
46
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (OAC-1531128)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Intramural Research (R01AI166050)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcoglycans, glycosylation, N-glycans, dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, conformational ensembles, protein flexibility, glycosylation site mutations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review