The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of iterative soft thresholding for fast reconstruction of NMR data non-uniformly sampled with multidimensional Poisson Gap scheduling
Open accessAbstract
The fast Fourier transformation has been the gold standard for transforming data from time to frequency domain in many spectroscopic methods, including NMR. While reliable, it has as a drawback that it requires a grid of uniformly sampled data points. This needs very long measuring times for sampling in multidimensional experiments in all indirect dimensions uniformly and even does not allow reaching optimal evolution times that would match the resolution power of modern high-field instruments. Thus, many alternative sampling and transformation schemes have been proposed. Their common challenges are the suppression of the artifacts due to the non-uniformity of the sampling schedules, the preservation of the relative signal amplitudes, and the computing time needed for spectra reconstruction. Here we present a fast implementation of the Iterative Soft Thresholding approach (istHMS) that can reconstruct high-resolution non-uniformly sampled NMR data up to four dimensions within a few hours and make routine reconstruction of high-resolution NUS 3D and 4D spectra convenient. We include a graphical user interface for generating sampling schedules with the Poisson-Gap method and an estimation of optimal evolution times based on molecular properties. The performance of the approach is demonstrated with the reconstruction of non-uniformly sampled medium and high-resolution 3D and 4D protein spectra acquired with sampling densities as low as 0.8%. The method presented here facilitates acquisition, reconstruction and use of multidimensional NMR spectra at otherwise unreachable spectral resolution in indirect dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629
Covalently circularized nanodiscs for studying membrane proteins and viral entry
Nasr, M. L., Baptista, D., Strauss, M., Sun, Z.-Y. J., Grigoriu, S., Huser, S., Plückthun, A., Hagn, F., Walz, T., Hogle, J. M., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4079 · Cited by 262
Self-citationZn-regulated GTPase metalloprotein activator 1 modulates vertebrate zinc homeostasis
Weiss, A., Murdoch, C. C., Edmonds, K. A., Jordan, M. R., Monteith, A. J., Perera, Y. R., Rodríguez Nassif, A. M., Petoletti, A. M., Beavers, W. N., Munneke, M. J., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.011 · Cited by 113
Martin, J. E., Edmonds, K. A., Bruce, K. E., Campanello, G. C., Eijkelkamp, B. A., Brazel, E. B., McDevitt, C. A., Winkler, M. E., & Giedroc, D. P. (2017) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.13654 · Cited by 38
Zuber, P. K., Daviter, T., Heißmann, R., Persau, U., Schweimer, K., & Knauer, S. H. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76630 · Cited by 29
Bishop, A. C., Torres-Montalvo, G., Kotaru, S., Mimun, K., & Wand, A. J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37219-z · Cited by 16
Öster, C., Chevelkov, V., & Lange, A. (2025) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/s10858-024-00454-7 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyberts, S. G., Milbradt, A. G., Wagner, A. B., Arthanari, H., & Wagner, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR
- Published
- 2012-02-14
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-327
- ISSN
- 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5001
- OpenAlex
- W2046282779
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.