Diagnosing Oppositional Defiant Disorder Using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Parent Version and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule, Child and Parent Versions has been found to be reliable and valid for the diagnosis of ODD, in addition to anxiety and affective disorders.
“The ADIS-C/P has been found to be reliable and valid for the diagnosis of ODD, in addition to the anxiety and affective disorders (Anderson & Ollendick, 2012).”
From Perceived Parent–Child Relations, Conduct Problems, and Clinical Improvement Following the Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Anderson & Ollendick, 2012
Cites
Wood, J. J., Piacentini, J. C., Bergman, R. L., McCracken, J., & Barrios, V. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3103_05 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Booker, J. A., Ollendick, T. H., Dunsmore, J. C., & Greene, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0323-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Anderson, S. R., & Ollendick, T. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Published
- 2012-05-19
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 467-475
- ISSN
- 0882-2689
- 1573-3505
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
