The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Work–Family Conflict: The Importance of Family-Friendly Employment Practices and Family-Supportive Supervisors
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Family supportive supervisors who accommodate flexible schedules reduce perceptions of work-family conflict for focal employees and their significant others.
“Moreover, having family supportive supervisors that are willing to accommodate flexible schedules both formally and informally has been shown to significantly reduce perceptions of work-family conflict for the focal employee and their significant others (Breaugh & Frye, 2008).”
From Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations’ Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being (2021) · cites this paper as Breaugh & Frye, 2008
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 173
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435. · DOI
- Breaugh, J. A. (2003). Effect size estimation: Factors to consider and mistakes to avoid. Journal of Management, 29, 79–97. · DOI
- Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Kalliath, T. J. (2005). The ability of “family friendly” organizational resources to predict work–family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21, 223–234. · DOI
- Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198. · DOI
- Carlson, D. S., & Perrewe, P. L. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor-strain relationship: An examination of work–family conflict. Journal of Management, 25, 513–540. · DOI
- Casper, W. J., & Buffardi, L. C. (2004). Work-life benefits and job pursuit intentions: The role of anticipated organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 391–410. · DOI
- Desrochers, S., Hilton, J., & Larwood, L. (2005). Preliminary validation of the work–family integration-blurring scale. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 442–466. · DOI
- Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197. · DOI
- Glass, J. L., & Finley, A. (2002). Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 313–337. · DOI
- Golden, T. D. (2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 319–340. · DOI
- Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318. · DOI · Paper page
- Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work–family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 419–436. · DOI
- Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., Newson, J. T., Brockwood, K. J., & Colton, C. L. (2005). A longitudinal study of the effects of dual-earner couples’ utilization of family-friendly workplace supports on work and family outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 799–810. · DOI
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–165). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
- Kossek, E. E. (2005). Workplace policies and practices to support work and families. In S. Bianchi, L. Casper, & R. King (Eds.), Work, family health and well-being (pp. 97–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367. · DOI · Paper page
- Madsen, S. R. (2003). The effects of home-based teleworking on work–family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 35–58. · DOI
- O’Driscoll, M. P., Poelmans, S., Spector, P. E., Kalliath, T., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., et al. (2003). Family-responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work–family conflict, and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 326–344. · DOI
- Shinn, M., Wong, N. W., Simko, P. A., & Ortiz-Torres, B. (1989). Promoting the well-being of working parents: Coping, social support, and flexible job schedules. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 31–35. · DOI
- Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6–15. · DOI
- Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415. · DOI
- Warren, J. A., & Johnson, P. J. (1995). The impact of workplace support on work–family role strain. Family Relations, 44, 163–169. · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Breaugh, J. A., & Frye, N. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Breaugh, James A.
- Venue
- Journal of Business and Psychology
- Published
- 2008-04-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345-353
- ISSN
- 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-353X
- OpenAlex
- W1992960623
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 23.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- work-family conflict, remote work, working from home, flexible working hours, family leave, work-family balance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review