When is nothing something? Editorial for the null results special issue of Journal of Business and Psychology
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Publishing nonsignificant findings is important for identifying boundary conditions of established effects and informing future research.
“The publication of nonsignificant findings is important to identify boundary conditions for established effects and to inform future research (Landis et al., 2014) and the value of nonsignificant results should be discussed in discussion sections as a way to advance scientific practice.”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them (2023) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2014
In “Why Encourage Publication of Null Results?” the editorial says null findings can inform the usefulness or validity of a theory, and its Conclusions say such findings inform the field. It does not specifically say that publishing them identifies boundary conditions for established effects; that is a more specific claim than the passages support. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Avoiding Bias in Publication Bias Research: The Value of “Null” Findings
Kepes, S., Banks, G. C., & Oh, I. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9279-0 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Exploring the Effects of Value Diversity on Team Effectiveness
Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Poling, T. L. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9267-4 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Major, D. A., Morganson, V. J., & Bolen, H. M. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9282-5 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Landis, R. S., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2013) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/iops.12054 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationMueller, K., Straatmann, T., Hattrup, K., & Jochum, M. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9262-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Publication Bias Might Make Us Untrustworthy, But the Solutions May Be Worse
Leavitt, K. (2013) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/iops.12052 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Carter, N. T., Kotrba, L. M., & Lake, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9283-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Outcomes of Peak, Typical, and Variability in Performance of College Football Teams
LoPilato, A. C., Hoffman, B. J., & Overstreet, B. L. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9336-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
Antonakis, J. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationInductive reasoning: The promise of big data
McAbee, S. T., Landis, R. S., & Burke, M. I. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.005 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationMoser, K. J., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2017) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.001 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Sheel, R. C., & Vohra, N. (2015) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1072102 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them
Arch, J. J., Fishbein, J. N., Finkelstein, L. B., & Luoma, J. B. (2023) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.005 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A framework for learning from null results
Jacob, R. T., Doolittle, F., Kemple, J., & Somers, M.-A. (2019) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x19891955 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science
Byington, E. K., & Felps, W. (2016) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0035 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Innovation with field experiments: Studying organizational behaviors in actual organizations
Hauser, O., Linos, E., & Rogers, T. (2017) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.004 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., Tonidandel, S., & Truxillo, D. M. (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2017.55 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationJohns, G., & Hajj, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2055 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Hart, P. S., Campbell-Árvai, V., Wolske, K. S., & Raimi, K. T. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102656 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Banks, G. C., Landis, R. S., & Tonidandel, S. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618767883 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationFollowing Up on Employee Surveys: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Review
Huebner, L.-A. M., & Zacher, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.801073 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
On Partial Versus Full Mediation and the Importance of Effect Sizes
Ledermann, T., Rudaz, M., & Fritz, M. S. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251355585 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Brossoit, R. M., Crain, T. L., Hammer, L. B., Lee, S., Bodner, T., & Buxton, O. M. (2020) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2941 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wurzer, T., & Reiner, G. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2017-0152 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Is Holding Two Jobs Too Much? An Examination of Dual Jobholders
Webster, B. D., Edwards, B., & Smith, M. B. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9540-2 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Open Science Challenge: Adopt One Practice that Enacts Widely Shared Values
Castille, C. M., Kreamer, L. M., Albritton, B. H., Banks, G. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09806-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationBowling, N. A., Gibson, A. M., & DeSimone, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09787-8 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Evidence against a relation between bilingualism and creativity
Lange, K., Hopman, E. W. M., Zemla, J. C., & Austerweil, J. L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234928 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Results-blind review: a masked crusader for science
Woznyj, H. M., Grenier, K., Ross, R. L., Banks, G. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2018) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2018.1496081 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationOne finding is no finding: Toward a replication culture in family business research
Brinkerink, J., Massis, A. D., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2022) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100521 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Fernández‐Castilla, B., Said‐Metwaly, S., Kreitchmann, R. S., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02373-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Strah, N., Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., King, E. B., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2797 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Franke, H., Kwasnitschka, D., Schmutz, J. B., & Netland, T. H. (2024) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1300 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Being unwanted and other very early predictors of adult psychopathy
Zara, G., Bergstrøm, H., & Farrington, D. P. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-01-2023-0002 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Do Affective States Influence Risk Preferences?
Treffers, T., Koellinger, P., & Picot, A. (2016) · Schmalenbach Business Review · doi:10.1007/s41464-016-0018-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Confronting sexism: Identifying dimensions and exploring impact
Dray, K. K., & Sabat, I. E. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12861 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Timming, A. R., Farndale, E., Budhwar, P. S., & Wood, G. (2021) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12359 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nguyen, N. T. H. (2022) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/00910260221129840 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gender differences in supervisors’ multidimensional performance ratings: Large sample evidence
Stone, T. H., Foster, J. L., Webster, B. D., Harrison, J. A., & Jawahar, I. M. “. (2016) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2016.1224884 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Handke, L., O’Neill, T., McLarnon, M. J. W., & Kauffeld, S. (2024) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2024.2441884 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Keener, S. K., Kepes, S., & Torka, A. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Effects of Action Planning After Employee Surveys
Huebner, L.-A. M., & Zacher, H. (2021) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000285 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lehmberg, D., & Tangpong, C. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.32 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Outcome Reporting Bias in Randomized Experiments on Substance Use Disorders
Wooditch, A., Sloas, L. B., Wu, X., & Key, A. (2018) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-018-9388-7 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Götz, M., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120230000041004 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The significance of nothing: a call to discussion
Petrescu, M., & Krishen, A. S. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-025-00447-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pedersen, A., Kirchner, K., Larson, B. Z., Hasle, M., Edwards, K., & Ipsen, C. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-01-2025-0068 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Al‐Fayez, D., & Goodman, D. (2023) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/00910260231173082 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Looking at the bigger picture: on the relevance of null effects of model differences across time
Ehrlich, J. S., Kreienbaum, C., & Ringle, C. M. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-026-00497-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Advancing influence tactics to the team level: the case of self-managed teams
Unger-Aviram, E., Katz‐Navon, T., & Vashdi, D. R. (2022) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Exposing the Role of Gender in the Performance of Founding Entrepreneurs
Batchelor, J. H. (2015) · Journal of Small Business Strategy · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kolijn, L., van den Bulk, B. G., Euser, S., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Huffmeijer, R. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1972 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bryant, E., Fidler, A., & Fedele, D. (2021) · UF Journal of Undergraduate Research · doi:10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128430 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Leone, K. L., Lepper, B. T., Eren, M. I., & Pansing, L. L. (2022) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103345 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Desforges-Houle, A., & Tacon, R. (2025) · Managing Sport and Leisure · doi:10.1080/23750472.2024.2443446 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Documentation Requirements in Political Science Journals: Moving Towards Open Access Practices
Curvale, C., & Pérez-Arrobo, G. (2021) · Revista de ciencia política · doi:10.4067/s0718-090x2021005000108 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Neville, L. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q9r72 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Müller, L., Goldhahn, D., & Heyer, G. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_36
Chittle, L., Horton, S., & Dixon, J. C. (2020) · Journal of Amateur Sport · doi:10.17161/jas.v6i2.9745
Mutignani, L. M., Steggerda, J. C., Scafe, M. J., Vengurlekar, I. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2024) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107476
Batz-Barbarich, C. L., Strah, N., & Ahmed, F. M. (2025) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000364
Research Methods, Design, and Statistics in Media Psychology
Prot, S., Anderson, C. A., & Kim, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197689875.013.0006
Hidden processes of workflow in cognitive developmental psychology
Girouard‐Hallam, L. N., & Gelman, S. A. (2026) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0611 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Made with AI” but why? How consumers interpret beneficiary-framed AI disclosures in advertising
Schreiner, T., Bart, Y., Pauwels, K. H., Schütze, C., & Buder, F. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-026-00534-7 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lindahl, O. K. V., Grym, J., Hakulinen, C. A., & Jaakko Aspara, A. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-026-00546-3
Quality, not conscience: an informative null on what a “Made in Italy” label transfers
Aichner, T. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-026-00560-5
- Authors
- Landis, R. S., James, L. R., Lance, C. E., Pierce, C. A., & Rogelberg, S. G.
- Affiliations
- Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Corresponding author
- Landis, Ronald S.
- Venue
- Journal of Business and Psychology
- Published
- 2014-02-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-167
- ISSN
- 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-353X
- OpenAlex
- W2153353925
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- negative results, research evaluation, peer review, editorial practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review