Cited by 147Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of the Literature Exploring Illness Perceptions in Mental Health Utilising the Self-Regulation Model

Baines, Tineke, Wittkowski, Anja·2013·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Psychologists have utilised a range of social cognition models to understand variation in physical health and illness-related behaviours. The most widely studied model of illness perceptions has been the Self-Regulation Model (SRM, Leventhal, Nerenz, & Steele, 1984). The illness perceptions questionnaire (IPQ) and its revised version (IPQ-R) have been utilised to explore illness beliefs in physical health. This review examined 13 quantitative studies, which used the IPQ and IPQ-R in mental health in their exploration of illness perceptions in psychosis, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, depression and adolescents experiencing mood disorders. Across these studies the SRM illness dimensions were largely supported. Mental illnesses were commonly viewed as cyclical and chronic, with serious negative consequences. Perceptions regarding chronicity, controllability and negative consequences were associated with coping and help seeking, while engagement with services and help seeking were also related to illness coherence beliefs. Treatment adherence was linked to beliefs that treatment could control one's illness. Whilst a major limitation of the reviewed studies was the use of cross-sectional designs, overall the applicability of the SRM to mental health was supported. The IPQ and IPQ-R were shown to be valuable measures of illness perceptions in mental health, offering implications for clinical practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-012-9337-9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Metadata

Authors
Baines, T., & Wittkowski, A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Wittkowski, Anja
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2012-10-30
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
263-274
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W1982053533
Cited by
147
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
illness perception, self-regulation model, mental health, psychosis, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, depression, adolescents, mood disorders, help-seeking, medication adherence, coping, illness coherence, chronicity, controllability, negative consequences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Spain, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review