Cited by 13Diabetes Management and EducationMedication Adherence and ComplianceNursing care and research

Self-care adherence and psychological functioning of older patients with type 2 diabetes: effects of persuasion, social pressure, and self-efficacy

Yang, Fang, Pang, Joyce S., Cheng, Wendy J. Y.·2016·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined the role of family members' use of persuasion versus pressure as distinct forms of social control by which family members attempt to encourage better diabetes management among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study also examined how self-efficacy might moderate the relationship between persuasion/pressure, psychological functioning, and self-care adherence. Participants were 96 men and 103 women with T2DM, with a mean age of 63.3 years. Regression results show that neither persuasion nor pressure was significantly related to self-care adherence, but persuasion and pressure were associated in complex ways with diabetes-related emotional distress and depressive symptoms for which significant interaction effects were found. Patients with lower self-efficacy benefited from persuasion, but were adversely affected by pressure. In contrast, patients with higher self-efficacy were adversely affected by persuasion, but were less negatively affected by pressure. Findings highlight the importance of reducing pressure-based social control, considering patients' self-efficacy when family members seek to influence patients' self-care behaviors, and targeting patient-family interactions in future interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-016-9470-y

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Pang, J. S., & Cheng, W. J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • INSEAD (SG)
Corresponding author
Yang, Fang
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2016-10-13
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
389-401
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2531120161
Cited by
12
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission "Chenguang Scholar Program" (15CG46)
  • Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation (M4060918.100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, self-care adherence, family influence, persuasion, social pressure, social control, self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, patient-family interaction, psychological functioning
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Persuasive Communication, Self Care, Social Support, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review