Cited by 124Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaElder Abuse and Neglect

The Intergenerational Transmission of Intimate Partner Violence: Differentiating Correlates in a Random Community Sample

Franklin, Cortney A., Kercher, Glen A.·2012·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-012-9419-3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franklin, C. A., & Kercher, G. A.
Affiliations
Sam Houston State University (US)
Corresponding author
Franklin, Cortney A.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
187-199
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W1969176726
Cited by
124
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Houston
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intergenerational transmission of violence, intimate partner violence, psychological violence, physical violence, intimate partner violence perpetration, intimate partner violence victimization, protective factors, marriage, employment, age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review