Cited by 4Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationSocial Work Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond “Dead Words”: Enhancing Documentation Practices for Domestic Violence-Informed Work

Open access
Isobe, Jasmin, Laing, Lesley, Kertesz, Margaret, Humphreys, Cathy·2025·Journal of Family Violence

Abstract

Purpose: Domestic violence-informed documentation practices across health and human services were explored as an aspect of a wider action research project in New South Wales, Australia. In health and human service responses to families living at the intersection of domestic violence, substance misuse and mental ill-health, practitioners navigate the complexities of collaborative and integrated work to address violence and abuse. Documentation is an aspect of practice where ethical, quality and safety issues arise, impacting individuals, organizations, and service sectors. Methods: Senior practitioners from specialist domestic violence, substance use, mental health and child protection services participated in a series of Communities of Practice to explore integrated and collaborative practice using the Safe & Together™ Model approach to working with families impacted by domestic violence and abuse. Documentary practices were explored as an important aspect of the wider research project, and ethnographic notes from Community of Practice and reflective focus groups were thematically analyzed. Results: Four key themes regarding domestic violence-informed documentation practices were highlighted in the analysis: recognizing the power of documentation; maintaining an all-of-family focus; focussing on patterns and context; and the importance of language that emphasizes behavioral specificity. Taken together, these themes speak to the powerful role played by domestic violence-informed documentation for clients accessing services, as well as to the opportunity for practice-changing work through documentation that diverse practitioners can take up when working with families and with each other. Conclusion: This paper contributes to a growing body of practice-led knowledge building and provides an in-depth examination of domestic violence-informed documentation practices from the perspectives of practitioners working at the intersections of domestic violence, substance use, mental health and child protection issues across health and human services. It highlights the complex and empowering opportunities that attention to language and documentation holds and emphasizes the need for further research exploration and capacity building for domestic violence-informed practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-025-00811-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (2003). Action Research. In M. Alston, & W. Bowles (Eds.), Research for social workers. An introduction to methods (2nd ed., pp. 158–186). Allen and Unwin.
  2. Armstrong, E. M. (2023). Promise and pitfalls: Trauma informed care, trauma services, and efforts to address both substance use disorders and intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 38(5), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00378-6 · DOI
  3. Bastian, C., & Wendt, S. (2023). Collaboration between Child Protection and Domestic and Family Violence: A case file review. Australian Social Work, 76(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2021.2000627 · DOI
  4. Bilson, A., Featherstone, B., & Martin, K. (2017). How child protection’s ‘investigative turn’ impacts on poor and deprived communities. Family Law, 47, 416–419.
  5. Blome, W. W., & Steib, S. D. (2014). The organizational structure of child welfare: Staff are working hard, but it is hardly working. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.018 · DOI
  6. Bostock, L., & Koprowska, J. (2022). I know how it sounds on paper’ risk talk, the use of documents and epistemic justice in child protection assessment home visits. Qualitative Social Work, 21(6), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124217 · DOI
  7. Brennan, I. R., Burton, V., Gormally, S., & O’Leary, N. (2019). Service Provider difficulties in Operationalizing Coercive Control. Violence against Women, 25(6), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218797478 · DOI
  8. Canfield, M., Radcliffe, P., D’Oliveira, A. F., & Gilchrist, G. (2019). Factors associated with the severity of IPV perpetrated by substance using men towards current partner. Advances in Dual Diagnosishttps://doi.org/10.1108/add-04-2019-0003 · DOI
  9. Cumming, S., Fitzpatrick, E., McAuliffe, D., McKain, S., Martin, C., & Tonge, A. (2007). Raising the Titanic: Rescuing Social Work Documentation from the sea of ethical risk. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070701323857 · DOI
  10. Darlington, Y., Feeney, J. A., & Rixon, K. (2005). Interagency collaboration between child protection and mental health services: Practices, attitudes and barriers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1085–1098. · DOI
  11. Ferguson, H. (2016). What social workers do in performing child protection work: Evidence from research into face-to-face practice. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12142 · DOI
  12. Ferguson, H. (2018). Making home visits: Creativity and the embodied practices of home visiting in social work and child protection. Qualitative Social Work, 17(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016656751 · DOI
  13. Frederico, M., Jackson, A., & Dwyer, J. (2014). Child protection and cross-sector practice: An analysis of child death reviews to inform practice when multiple parental risk factors are present. Child Abuse Review, 23(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2321 · DOI
  14. Gibson, K., Samuels, G., & Pryce, J. (2018). Authors of accountability: Paperwork and social work in contemporary child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 85, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.010. ScienceDirect. · DOI
  15. Gilchrist, G., Hegarty, K., Chondros, P., Herman, H., & Gunn, J. (2010). The association between intimate partner violence, alcohol and depression in family practice. BMC Family Practice, 11, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-72 · DOI
  16. Hasenfeld, Y. (1972). People processing organizations: An exchange approach. American Sociological Review, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093466 · DOI
  17. Hasenfeld, Y., & Paton, A. (1983). Human service organizations (Vol. 50p.). Prentice-Hall.
  18. Heward-Belle, S. L., Kertesz, M., Humphreys, C., Tsantefski, M., & Isobe, J. (2022). Participatory practice guideline development at the intersections of domestic and family violence, mental distress and/or parental substance use. Advances in Dual Diagnosis, 15(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/add-12-2021-0017 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Holly, J., & Horvath, M. A. H. (2012). A question of commitment – improving practitioner responses to domestic and sexual violence, problematic substance use and mental ill-health. Advances in Dual Diagnosis, 5(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/17570971211241912 · DOI
  20. Humphreys, C., & Kertesz, M. (2012). Putting the heart back into the record’: Personal records to support Young people in Care. Adoption & Fostering, 36(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857591203600105 · DOI
  21. Humphreys, C., & Kertesz, M. (2015). Making records meaningful: Creating an identity resource for young people in care. Australian Social Work, 68, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.960434 · DOI
  22. Humphreys, C., & Thiara, R. (2003). Mental Health and domestic violence: ‘I call it symptoms of abuse’. The British Journal of Social Work, 33(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.2.209 · DOI
  23. Humphreys, C., Regan, L., River, D., & Thiara, R. K. (2005). Domestic violence and substance use: Tackling complexity. British Journal of Social Work, 35(8), 1303–1320. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch212 · DOI
  24. Humphreys, C., Healey, L., & Mandel, D. (2018). Case reading as a practice and training intervention in domestic violence and child protection. Australian Social Work, 71(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2017.1413666 · DOI
  25. Humphreys, C., Heward-Belle, S., Tsantefski, M., Isobe, J., & Healey, L. (2022). Beyond co-occurrence: Addressing the intersections of domestic violence, mental health and substance misuse. Child & Family Social Work, 27(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12885 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Humphreys, C., Isobe, J., & Kertesz, M. (2024). Who’s got my back?’: Worker safety in the context of domestic abuse. Child & Family Social Work, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13129 · DOI
  27. Isobe, J., Healey, L., & Humphreys, C. (2020). A critical interpretive synthesis of the intersection of domestic violence with parental issues of mental health and substance misuse. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(5), 1394–1407. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12978 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ison, R. (2008). Systems thinking and practice for action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 139–158). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.n15 · DOI
  29. Laracuente, M. S. (2017). Therapeutic engagement with partner-abusive fathers. Family Journal, 25(4), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717731221 · DOI
  30. Mason, R., & O’Rinn, S. E. (2014). Co-occurring intimate partner violence, mental health, and substance use problems: A scoping review. Glob Health Action, 7(24815). https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24815 · DOI
  31. Moses, D. J., Reed, B. G., Mazelis, R., & D’Ambrosio, B. (2003). Creating trauma services for women with co-occurring disorders: Experiences from the SAMHSA women with alcohol, drug abuse and mental health disorders who have histories of violence study. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252171592_Creating_Trauma_Services_for_Women_with_Co-Occurring_Disorders
  32. Nelson, H., Bougatsos, C., & Blazina, I. (2012). Screening women for intimate partner violence: A systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. preventive service task force recommendation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-11-201206050-00447 · DOI
  33. Noether, C. D., Finkelstein, N., VanDeMark, N. R., Savage, A., Reed, B. G., & Moses, D. J. (2005). Design strengths and issues of SAMHSA’s women, co-occurring disorders, and violence study. Psychiatric Services, 56(10), 1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.10.1233 · DOI
  34. Phillips, H., Lyon, E., Krans, E. E., Warshaw, C., Chang, J. C., & Pallatino, C. (2021). Barriers to help-seeking among intimate partner violence survivors with opioid use disorder. International Review of Psychiatry, 33(6), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2021.1898350 · DOI
  35. Radcliffe, P., & Gilchrist, G. (2016). You can never work with addictions in isolation: Addressing intimate partner violence perpetration by men in substance misuse treatment. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 36, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.03.010 · DOI
  36. Reamer, F. (2001). The social work ethics audit: A risk management tool. NASW.
  37. Spangaro, J. (2017). What is the role of health systems in responding to domestic violence? An evidence review. Australian Health Review, 41(6), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah16155 · DOI
  38. Spangaro, J., Vajda, J., Klineberg, E., Lin, S., Griffiths, C., Saberi, E., Field, E., Miller, A., & McNamara, L. (2020). Intimate partner violence screening and response in New South Wales emergency departments: A multi-site feasibility study. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 32(4), 548–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13452 · DOI
  39. Stake, R. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford.
  40. Taft, A., O’Doherty, L., Hegarty, K., Ramsay, J., Davidson, L., & Feder, G. (2013). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD007007. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub2 · DOI
  41. Trevillion, K., Oram, S., Feder, G., & Howard, L. M. (2012). Experiences of domestic violence and mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One, 7(12), e51740. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051740 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Trevillion, K., Corker, E., Capron, L. E., & Oram, S. (2016). Improving mental health service responses to domestic violence and abuse. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(5), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2016.1201053 · DOI
  43. Tseris, E. (2019). Trauma, women’s mental health, and social justice: Pitfalls and Possibilities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107820 · DOI
  44. Wade, A. (1997). Small acts of living: Everyday resistance to violence and other forms of oppression. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026154215299 · DOI
  45. Warshaw, C., & Tinnon, E. (2018). Coercion related to mental health and substance use in the context of intimate partner violence: A toolkit for screening, assessment, and brief counseling in primary care and behavioral health settings. National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma and Mental Health and the National Domestic Violence Hotline.
  46. Warshaw, C., Gugenheim, M., Moroney, G., & Barnes, H. (2003). Special report - fragmented services, unmet needs: Building collaboration between the mental health and domestic violence communities. Health Affairs, 22(5), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.5.230 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Isobe, J., Laing, L., Kertesz, M., & Humphreys, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Isobe, Jasmin
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2025-01-22
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W4406716744
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NSW Ministry of Health (NSW Ministry of Health)
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
domestic violence, documentation practices, integrated practice, collaborative practice, substance abuse, mental illness, child protection, behavioral specificity, communities of practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review