Cited by 129Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

The Association Between Comorbidity and Outcome in Pathological Gambling: A Prospective Follow-up of Recent Quitters

Open access
Hodgins, David C., Peden, Nicole, Cassidy, Erin·2005·Journal of Gambling Studies

Abstract

A naturalistic sample of pathological gamblers (N = 101) who recently quit gambling was followed prospectively for a year (follow-up rate 80%). Lifetime mood disorders were identified in 61% of participants and 73% and 48% had lifetime alcohol use and drug use disorders, respectively. Current prevalence rates, however, were much lower. Current mood disorders were found for 20% and 7% had a current alcohol disorder and 7% a current drug use disorder. Age of onset for substance use disorders was earlier than gambling disorders but mood disorders were equally likely to predate or follow gambling disorders. Lifetime mood disorder was associated with a longer time to achieve 3 months of stable abstinence. Participants who were currently in treatment or attending Gamblers Anonymous and the small number of participants with current alcohol disorders were also more likely to achieve abstinence earlier. The results underscore the importance of increasing our understanding of the role of comorbid disorders in the recovery process from gambling problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10899-005-3099-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a mood disorder appears to be associated with a longer time to achieving stable abstinence.

    “With regard to treatment, the presence of a mood disorder appears to be associated with longer time to achieving stable abstinence (Hodgins, Peden, & Cassidy, 2005).”

    From Subtyping Pathological Gamblers Based on Impulsivity, Depression, and Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Hodgins, Peden, & Cassidy, 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 129

Authors
Hodgins, D. C., Peden, N., & Cassidy, E.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Hodgins, David C.
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published
2005-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
255-271
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
OpenAlex
W2167921688
Cited by
129
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
gambling addiction, comorbidities, mood disorders, alcoholism, drug use disorders, gambling cessation, abstinence, treatment seeking, Gamblers Anonymous, age of onset, recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Self Efficacy, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review