CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathological gamblers: Inpatients' versus outpatients' characteristics

Ladouceur, Robert, Sylvain, Caroline, Sévigny, Serge, Poirier, Lynda, Brisson, Laurent, Dias, Carlos, Dufour, Claudie, Pilote, Pierrette·2006·Journal of Gambling Studies
DOI 10.1007/s10899-006-9022-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Several researchers and clinicians have questioned the advantages and disadvantages of inpatient and outpatient treatment for people suffering from pathological gambling. This study compares the characteristics of pathological gamblers seeking inpatient and outpatient treatment. A total of 233 pathological gamblers (inpatients = 134, outpatients = 99) participated in the study. Results show that inpatients have more severe gambling problems than those receiving outpatient services. Similar results were obtained on most other related variables such as anxiety, depression, alcohol consumption, and comorbidity. These results are discussed in terms of the costs and benefits of these two treatment modalities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10899-006-9022-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been few studies exploring the influence of treatment and therapist characteristics in treatment outcome studies in the gambling field.

    “There have, however, been few studies exploring the influence of these characteristics in treatment outcome studies in the gambling field (Crisp, Thomas, Jackson, & Thomason, 2001;Dowling & Cosic, 2011;Ladouceur et al., 2006).”

    From Predictors of outcomes of psychological treatments for disordered gambling: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Ladouceur et al., 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory—second edition manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
  2. Nielsen, P., & Rojskjaer, S. (2005). Ludomani; Karakteristika, psykopatologi of behandlingsforlob. Ringgarden: Denmark.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Sévigny, S., Poirier, L., Brisson, L., Dias, C., Dufour, C., & Pilote, P.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Centre Casa (CA)
Corresponding author
Ladouceur, Robert
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-08-03
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
443-450
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
DOI
10.1007/s10899-006-9022-8
OpenAlex
W1999201005
Cited by
27
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
gambling addiction, inpatient care, outpatient care, treatment comparison, anxiety, depression, alcohol consumption, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Gambling, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quebec, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review