An intentional model of emotional well-being: the development and initial validation of a measure of subjective well-being
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The subjective component of well-being was consistently divided into an affective component concerned with emotions and a cognitive component concerned with how people evaluate their own lives.
“The subjective component of well-being was consistently divided into an ‘affective’ component concerned with emotions and a ‘cognitive’ component concerned with how people evaluate their own lives.50 109”
From Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Şimşek, Ö. F.
- Affiliations
- İzmir University of Economics (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Şimşek, Ömer Faruk
- ORCID
- Şimşek, Ömer Faruk
- Venue
- Journal of Happiness Studies
- Published
- 2010-04-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-442
- ISSN
- 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7780
- OpenAlex
- W2130755789
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- emotional well-being, subjective well-being, intentionality, scale development, psychometric validation, factor structure, test-retest stability, extraversion, neuroticism, incremental validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
