Cited by 22Obesity and Health PracticesPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Unhappy and Happy Obesity: A Comparative Study on the United States and China

Sato, Kazuma·2021·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-020-00272-2

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, K.
Affiliations
Takushoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sato, Kazuma
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
1259-1285
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W3031107724
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17KT0037)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, subjective well-being, happiness, overweight, underweight, gender differences, cross-cultural comparison, weight stigma, China, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review