Cited by 17Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMedia and Digital Communication

Effects of Self-Presentation Strategy and Tie Strength on Facebook Users’ Happiness and Subjective Vitality

Jang, Wonseok Eric, Chun, Jung Won, Kim, Jihoon Jay, Bucy, Erik·2021·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-020-00348-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 17

Authors
Jang, W. E., Chun, J. W., Kim, J. J., & Bucy, E.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Sejong University (KR)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Chun, Jung Won
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2021-01-15
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
2961-2979
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W3120927834
Cited by
17
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
self-presentation, strategic self-presentation, tie strength, Facebook, happiness, subjective vitality, subjective well-being, weak ties, strong ties, relationship maintenance, social media self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review