Cited by 84Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMental Health Treatment and AccessSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Model minority stereotype: influence on perceived mental health needs of Asian Americans

Cheng, Alice W., Chang, Janet, O’Brien, Janine, Budgazad, Marc S., Tsai, Jack·2017·Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Abstract

This study examined the influence of the model minority stereotype on the perceived mental health functioning of Asian Americans. It was hypothesized that college students would perceive Asian Americans as having fewer mental health problems and clinical symptoms than Whites due to the model minority stereotype. Four hundred and twenty-five undergraduate students from a predominately White college campus in the American northeast were randomly exposed to one of four conditions: (1) a clinical vignette describing a White college student suffering from adjustment disorder; (2) the same vignette describing an Asian American college student; (3) a newspaper article describing a success story of Whites and the White clinical vignette; (4) the same newspaper article and clinical vignette describing an Asian American. Following exposure to one of the conditions, participants completed a memory recall task and measures of colorblindness, attitudes towards Asian Americans, attitudes towards out-group members, and perceived mental health functioning. Participants exposed to the vignettes primed with the positive/model minority stereotype perceived the target regardless of race/ethnicity as having better mental health functioning and less clinical symptoms than the condition without the stereotype. Additionally, the stereotype primer was found to be a modest predictor for the perception of mental health functioning in Asian American vignettes. Results shed light on the impact of the mod…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10903-016-0440-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 84

Authors
Cheng, A. W., Chang, J., O’Brien, J., Budgazad, M. S., & Tsai, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hartford (US)
  • Smith College (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Alice W.
Venue
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
572-581
ISSN
  • 1557-1912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1920
OpenAlex
W2475018535
Cited by
84
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
model minority stereotype, Asian Americans, perceived mental health, mental health needs, stereotype priming, adjustment disorder, color vision deficiency, outgroup attitudes, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asian, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Mental Recall, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stereotyping, United States, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review