Cited by 221Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Breakthrough of Large Language Models Release for Medical Applications: 1-Year Timeline and Perspectives

Open access

Abstract

Within the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLMs) represent sophisticated models engineered to comprehend, generate, and manipulate text resembling human language on an extensive scale. They are transformer-based deep learning architectures, obtained through the scaling of model size, pretraining of corpora, and computational resources. The potential healthcare applications of these models primarily involve chatbots and interaction systems for clinical documentation management, and medical literature summarization (Biomedical NLP). The challenge in this field lies in the research for applications in diagnostic and clinical decision support, as well as patient triage. Therefore, LLMs can be used for multiple tasks within patient care, research, and education. Throughout 2023, there has been an escalation in the release of LLMs, some of which are applicable in the healthcare domain. This remarkable output is largely the effect of the customization of pre-trained models for applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, or any system requiring human-like conversational engagement. As healthcare professionals, we recognize the imperative to stay at the forefront of knowledge. However, keeping abreast of the rapid evolution of this technology is practically unattainable, and, above all, understanding its potential applications and limitations remains a subject of ongoing debate. Consequently, this article aims to provide a succinct overview of the recently released LLMs, emphasizing their potential use in the field of medicine. Perspectives for a more extensive range of safe and effective applications are also discussed. The upcoming evolutionary leap involves the transition from an AI-powered model primarily designed for answering medical questions to a more versatile and practical tool for healthcare providers such as generalist biomedical AI systems for multimodal-based calibrated decision-making processes. On the other hand, the development of more accurate virtual clinical partners could enhance patient engagement, offering personalized support, and improving chronic disease management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-024-02045-3

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Timeline of selected large language models launched between December 2022 and December 2023
Fig. 1 Timeline of selected large language models launched between December 2022 and December 2023CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Current applications and perspectives of large language models in medicine. The battery symbol indicates the extent of current applications, ranging from one line to multiple lines
Fig. 2 Current applications and perspectives of large language models in medicine. The battery symbol indicates the extent of current applications, ranging from one line to multiple linesCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Radford A, Narasimhan K. Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training. 2018. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:49313245.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–221 of 221

Metadata

Authors
Cascella, M., Semeraro, F., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., Piazza, O., & Bignami, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Salerno (IT)
  • Ospedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi (IT)
  • Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Bellini, Valentina
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2024-02-17
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
22-22
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W4392782765
Cited by
219
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 51
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Parma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, medical applications of AI, clinical decision support, healthcare chatbots, triage, multimodal AI, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Communication, Documentation, Educational Status, Humans, Language, Electric Power Supplies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review