CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

People Automatically Extract Infants’ Sex from Faces

Tskhay, Konstantin O., Rule, Nicholas O.·2016·Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
DOI 10.1007/s10919-016-0235-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10919-016-0235-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sex of infant faces may be perceived automatically.

    “Indeed, the sex of infant faces may be perceived automatically (Tskhay & Rule, 2016).”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Tskhay & Rule, 2016

  • Adult participants were able to categorise the sex of 1-24 month old infants at levels above chance.

    “adult participants were able to categorise the sex of neonates (Kaminski et al., 2011; Porter, Cernoch & Balogh, 1984; Round & Deheragoda, 2002) and 1–24 month old infants (Tskhay & Rule, 2016) at levels above chance”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Tskhay & Rule, 2016

  • This result appears to contradict previous work showing that infant and neonate faces could be categorised accurately by sex.

    “This result appears to contradict previous work showing that infant and neonate faces could be categorised accurately by sex (Kaminski et al., 2011; Tskhay & Rule, 2016).”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Tskhay & Rule, 2016

  • In previous studies, accuracy levels for sex categorisation of infant and neonate faces were always low, despite being statistically above chance.

    “However, in these studies, accuracy levels were always low, despite being statistically above chance.”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Tskhay & Rule, 2016

  • These findings provide mixed support for previous research where infant sex was shown to be accurately judged from facial images.

    “These findings provide mixed support for previous research where infant sex was shown to be accurately judged from facial images (Tskhay & Rule, 2016).”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Tskhay & Rule, 2016

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. · DOI
  2. Antoszewska, A., & Wolański, N. (1991). Sexual dimorphism in newborns and adults. Studies in Human Ecology, 10, 23–38.
  3. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer Jr & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Brown, E., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). What gives a face its gender? Perception, 22, 829–840. · DOI
  5. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral dispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cheng, Y. D., O’Toole, A. J., & Abdi, H. (2001). Classifying adults’ and children’s faces by sex: Computational investigations of subcategorical feature encoding. Cognitive Science, 25, 819–838. · DOI
  7. Cloutier, J., Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2014). Investigating the early stages of person perception: The asymmetry of social categorization by sex vs. age. PLoS ONE, 9, e84677. · DOI
  8. Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff’s hypothesis. Language in Society, 6, 313–322. · DOI
  9. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. · DOI
  10. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. · DOI
  11. Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving sex directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16, 890–897. · DOI
  12. Kaminski, G., Meary, D., Mermillod, M., & Gentaz, E. (2011). Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1344–1349. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of the walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575–580. · DOI
  14. Macrae, C. N., Alnwick, K. A., Milne, A. B., & Schloerscheidt, A. M. (2002). Person perception across the menstrual cycle: Hormonal influences on social-cognitive functioning. Psychological Science, 13, 532–536. · DOI
  15. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. · DOI
  16. Macrae, C. N., & Martin, D. (2007). A boy primed Sue: Feature-base processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 793–805. · DOI
  17. Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 428–463). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  18. O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., Troje, N. F., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1997). Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception, 26, 75–84. · DOI
  19. Porter, R. H., Cernoch, J. M., & Balogh, R. D. (1984). Recognition of neonates by facial-visual characteristics. Pediatrics, 74, 501–504. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rheingold, H. L., & Cook, K. V. (1975). The contents of boys’ and girls’ rooms as an index of parents’ behavior. Child Development, 46, 459–463. · DOI
  21. Round, J. E. C., & Deheragoda, M. (2002). Sex—can you get it right? British Medical Journal, 325, 1446–1447. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105. · DOI
  23. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS ONE, 5, e8733. · DOI
  24. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B, Jr, & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 687–692. · DOI
  25. Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B, Jr, & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028. · DOI
  26. Rule, N. O., Garrett, J. V., & Ambady, N. (2010). On the perception of religious group membership from faces. PLoS ONE, 5, e14241. · DOI
  27. Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426. · DOI
  28. Rule, N. O., Macrae, C. N., & Ambady, N. (2009). Ambiguous group membership is extracted automatically from faces. Psychological Science, 20, 441–443. · DOI
  29. Samochowiec, J., Wänke, M., & Fiedler, K. (2010). Political ideology at face value. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 206–213. · DOI
  30. Smith, E. R., & Zarate, M. A. (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3–21. · DOI
  31. Stern, M., & Karraker, K. H. (1989). Sex stereotyping of infants: A review of gender labeling studies. Sex Roles, 20, 501–522. · DOI
  32. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecological Evolution, 11, 98–102. · DOI
  33. Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 72–86. · DOI
  34. Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Semantic information influences race categorization from faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 769–778. · DOI
  35. Wild, H. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., O’Toole, A. J., Cheng, Y. D., & Brooke, J. (2000). Recognition and sex categorization of adults’ and children’s faces: Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 269–291. · DOI
  36. Zaraté, M. A., & Smith, E. R. (1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 8, 161–185. · DOI
  37. Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O.
Venue
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-04-21
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
247-254
ISSN
  • 0191-5886
  • 1573-3653
DOI
10.1007/s10919-016-0235-y
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (CA)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review