CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization

Kaminski, Gwenaël, Méary, David, Mermillod, Martial, Gentaz, Edouard·2011·Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
DOI 10.3758/s13414-011-0139-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13414-011-0139-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This result appears to contradict previous work showing that infant and neonate faces could be categorised accurately by sex.

    “This result appears to contradict previous work showing that infant and neonate faces could be categorised accurately by sex (Kaminski et al., 2011; Tskhay & Rule, 2016).”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Kaminski et al., 2011

  • In previous studies, accuracy levels for sex categorisation of infant and neonate faces were always low, despite being statistically above chance.

    “However, in these studies, accuracy levels were always low, despite being statistically above chance.”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Kaminski et al., 2011

  • Adult participants were able to categorise the sex of neonates at levels above chance.

    “adult participants were able to categorise the sex of neonates (Kaminski et al., 2011; Porter, Cernoch & Balogh, 1984; Round & Deheragoda, 2002) and 1–24 month old infants (Tskhay & Rule, 2016) at levels above chance”

    From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Kaminski et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Edelman, B., & O’Toole, A. J. (1995). More about the difference between men and women: Evidence from linear neural networks and the principal-component approach. Perception, 24, 539–562. · DOI
  2. Baudouin, J.-Y., & Gallay, M. (2006). Is face distinctiveness gender based? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 789–798. · DOI
  3. Baudouin, J.-Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2002). Gender is a dimension of face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 362–365. · DOI
  4. Brown, E., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). What gives a face its gender. Perception, 22, 829–840. · DOI
  5. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Dench, N. (1993). What’s the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception, 22, 153–176. · DOI
  6. Cheng, Y. D., O’Toole, A. J., & Abdi, H. (2001). Classifying adults’ and children’s faces by sex: Computational investigations of subcategorical feature encoding. Cognitive Science, 25, 819–838. · DOI
  7. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1988). Spatial vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Dupuis-Roy, N., Fortin, I., Fiset, D., Gosselin, F. (2009). Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. Journal of Vision, 9(2), 10:1–8.
  9. Enlow, D. (1982). Handbook of facial growth. Philadephia: Saunders.
  10. French, R. M., Mareschal, D., Mermillod, M., & Quinn, P. C. (2004). The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 382–397. · DOI
  11. Gaspar, C., Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2008). Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Vision Research, 48, 2817–2826. · DOI
  12. Kuefner, D., Macchi Cassia, V., Picozzi, M., & Bricolo, E. (2008). Do all babies look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 807–820. · DOI
  13. Lamont, A. C., Stewart-Williams, S., & Podd, J. (2005). Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1017–1024. · DOI
  14. Macrae, C. N., & Martin, D. (2007). A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 793–805. · DOI
  15. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P. E., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 303–310. · DOI
  16. Mermillod, M., Bonin, P., Mondillon, L., Alleysson, D., & Vermeulen, N. (2010). Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions: Evidence from neural computation. Neurocomputing, 73, 2522–2531. · DOI
  17. Mermillod, M., Vuilleumier, P., Peyrin, C., Alleysson, D., & Marendaz, C. (2009a). The importance of low spatial frequency information for recognizing fearful facial expressions. Connection Science, 21, 75–83. · DOI
  18. Mermillod, M., Vermeulen, N., Lundqvist, D., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2009b). Neural computation as a tool to differentiate perceptual from emotional processes: The case of anger superiority effect. Cognition, 110, 346–357. · DOI
  19. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54–65. · DOI
  20. Porter, R. H., Cernoch, J. M., & Balogh, R. D. (1984). Recognition of neonates by facial–visual characteristics. Pediatrics, 74, 501–505. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Round, J. E. C., & Deheragoda, M. (2002). Sex—Can you get it right? British Medical Journal, 325, 1446–1447. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sergent, J. (1986). Microgenesis of face perception. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. M. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 17–33). Dordrecht: Kluwer. · DOI
  23. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 161–204. · DOI
  24. Wild, H. A., Barrett, S. E., Spence, M. J., O’Toole, A. J., Cheng, Y. D., & Brooke, J. (2000). Recognition and sex categorization of adults’ and children’s faces: Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 269–291. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaminski, G., Méary, D., Mermillod, M., & Gentaz, E.
Venue
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
1344-1349
ISSN
  • 1943-3921
  • 1943-393X
DOI
10.3758/s13414-011-0139-1
Cited by
16
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review