The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Cellulose from Simple and Low Cost Production Media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial cellulose pellicles were produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus using non conventional low-cost carbon sources, such as glycerol remaining from biodiesel production and grape bagasse, a residue of wine production. The carbon sources assayed showed their suitability for microbial cellulose production, with relatively high production values such as 10.0 g/l for the culture medium with glycerol from biodiesel as carbon source and corn steep liquor as nitrogen source; and 8.0 g/l for the culture medium containing grape bagasse and corn steep liquor. Glucose, commercial glycerol and cane molasses were also assayed as carbon sources for comparison. The bacterial celluloses produced were characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. Morphological analysis showed that bacterial cellulose microfibrils produced from the non-conventional media used were several micrometers long and had rectangular cross-sections with widths and thicknesses in the range of 35–70 and 13–24 nm, respectively. X-ray patterns showed crystallinity levels in the range of 74–79 % (area method), whereas both X-ray patterns and infrared spectroscopy evidenced the presence of peaks characteristic of Cellulose I polymorph. Besides thermal properties were similar to those found for the pellicle obtained from glucose. The study performed showed the suitability of using wine residues or glycerol remaining from increasing biodiesel production as cheap carbon sources for production of bacterial cellulose microfibrils, with similar characteristics as those obtained by use of more expensive carbon sources such as glucose or commercial glycerol. On the other hand, the low cost nitrogen sources used (corn steep liquor or diammonium phosphate) also contributed to the economy of the bioprocess.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959) · Textile Research Journal · doi:10.1177/004051755902901003 · Cited by 8,613
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., & Johnson, D. K. (2010) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 · Cited by 3,395
Nishiyama, Y., Langan, P., & Chanzy, H. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0257319 · Cited by 3,028
Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review
Siró, I., & Plackett, D. (2010) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y · Cited by 2,883
Azizi Samir, M. A. S., Alloin, F., & Dufresne, A. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0493685 · Cited by 2,311
Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers
Morán, J. I., Alvarez, V. A., Cyras, V. P., & Vázquez, A. (2008) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9 · Cited by 1,507
Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels
O'SULLIVAN, A. C. (1997) · Cellulose · doi:10.1023/a:1018431705579 · Cited by 1,499
Oh, S. Y., Yoo, D. I., Shin, Y., Kim, H. C., Kim, H. Y., Chung, Y. S., Park, W. H., & Youk, J. H. (2005) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007 · Cited by 1,389
Cited by
Nanocellulose based biodegradable polymers
Zinge, C., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2020) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109758 · Cited by 322
Production and Status of Bacterial Cellulose in Biomedical Engineering
Moniri, M., Boroumand Moghaddam, A., Azizi, S., Abdul Rahim, R., Bin Ariff, A., Zuhainis Saad, W., Navaderi, M., & Mohamad, R. (2017) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano7090257 · Cited by 319
Kadier, A., Ilyas, R. A., Huzaifah, M. R. M., Harihastuti, N., Sapuan, S. M., Harussani, M. M., Azlin, M. N. M., Yuliasni, R., Ibrahim, R., Atikah, M. S. N., et al. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13193365 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Vazquez, A., Foresti, M. L., Cerrutti, P., & Galvagno, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymers and the Environment
- Published
- 2012-11-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 545-554
- ISSN
- 1064-7546 (ISSN-L)
- 1566-2543
- 1572-8900
- OpenAlex
- W1986743182
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Cellulose from Simple and Low Cost Production Media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3
- The paper
- Vazquez, A., Foresti, M. L., Cerrutti, P., & Galvagno, M. (2013). Bacterial Cellulose from Simple and Low Cost Production Media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.