Cited by 12Pancreatic function and diabetesReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingDiabetes Management and Research

Mathematical modeling of the glucagon challenge test

Open access
Masroor, Saeed, van Dongen, Marloes G. J., Alvarez-Jimenez, Ricardo, Burggraaf, Koos, Peletier, Lambertus A., Peletier, Mark A.·2019·Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Abstract

A model for the homeostasis of glucose through the regulating hormones glucagon and insulin is described. It contains a subsystem that models the internalization of the glucagon receptor. Internalization is a mechanism in cell signaling, through which G-protein coupled receptors are taken from the surface of the cell to the endosome. The model is used to interpret data from a glucagon challenge test in which subjects have been under treatment with a novel glucagon receptor anti-sense drug which is aimed at reducing the number of receptors in the liver. It is shown how the receptor internalization results in tolerance of the blood glucose concentration to glucagon-induced hyperglycemia. We quantify the reduction of the number of receptors using the model and the data before and after treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10928-019-09655-2

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some mathematical models exist in the literature describing postprandial endogenous glucose production suppression as a function of plasma glucose, insulin, and glucagon.

    “Some mathematical models exist in the literature describing the postprandial EGP suppression as a function of plasma glucose, insulin [10, 11], and glucagon [12–15].”

    From Modeling the effect of glucagon on endogenous glucose production in healthy individuals under meal-like conditions (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction describes a mathematical model of glucose–insulin–glucagon interaction, and Methods (‘The hepatic glucose production rate’; page unavailable) models glucagon’s effect on liver glucose production. But the paper studies a glucagon challenge test, not postprandial suppression of endogenous glucose production; it also says its model neglects insulin’s effect on liver glucose production. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In these experimental conditions, this model and the other models of the literature are still suboptimal because they do not account for the glucagon evanescent effect visible in the data.

    “Nonetheless, in our experimental conditions, this [11] and the other models of the literature [10, 12–15] are still suboptimal since they do not account for the glucagon evanescent effect visible in the data (Fig. 1, Panel D).”
  • Most existing mathematical models of postprandial endogenous glucose production suppression use plasma glucose and not endogenous glucose production as the variable to fit.

    “However, most of them use plasma glucose and not EGP as a variable to fit.”

    From Modeling the effect of glucagon on endogenous glucose production in healthy individuals under meal-like conditions (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction discusses earlier glucose-homeostasis models, but does not say whether most fit plasma glucose rather than endogenous glucose production (EGP). The Methods section on the glucagon challenge test lists both blood-glucose measurements and hepatic glucose production rates; it does not establish the claimed pattern for postprandial models. Searches for postprandial EGP suppression and fitting variables found no passage addressing that comparison; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masroor, S., van Dongen, M. G. J., Alvarez-Jimenez, R., Burggraaf, K., Peletier, L. A., & Peletier, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Peletier, Mark A.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
553-564
ISSN
  • 1567-567X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8744
OpenAlex
W2978088004
Cited by
12
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (639.033.008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
glucose homeostasis, glucagon, insulin, G protein-coupled receptors, endocytosis, liver, hyperglycemia, mathematical model
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Glucagon, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Models, Theoretical, Receptors, Glucagon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review