Cited by 38Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

Evaluation of the SPARK child mentoring program: a social and emotional learning curriculum for elementary school students

Open access
Green, Amy L., Ferrante, Stephen, Boaz, Timothy L., Kutash, Krista, Wheeldon-Reece, Brooke·2021·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs seek to enhance social and emotional competencies in children, including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. By means of direct instruction regarding social and emotional competencies, SEL programs have the potential to strengthen resilience in children and thus their capacity to effectively cope with life's challenges. Strengthening resilience in children who are repeatedly exposed to adverse experiences, particularly those from economically disadvantaged minority backgrounds, is of particular importance and has implications for the prevention of a multitude of problems later in life. Our study reports the result of an investigation of the SPARK Child Mentoring program, a resilience-focused SEL program designed to reduce risk factors, uncover innate resilience, promote natural emotional well-being, and facilitate school success. We employed a randomized controlled trial comprising 94 elementary school students that included pre- and post-intervention measurements. After controlling for pre-intervention levels, we found a significant difference between students' understanding of underlying program principles; communication, decision making, and problem-solving skills; emotional regulation; and resilience for students who received the intervention compared to students who did not receive the intervention. These results provide initial evidence for the efficacy of the SPARK Child Mentoring program with a diverse sample of elementary school students and adds to the existing literature base concerning positive outcomes associated with SEL programs. We discuss implications for future research focused on long-term preventive effects of the program and the characteristics of students most likely to benefit from it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-021-00642-3

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SBM program helped students develop interpersonal communication, problem solving, and decision-making skills.

    “The program also helped students develop a variety of skills, such as interpersonal communication, problem solving, and decision-making (Meltzer et al., 2020; Green et al., 2021, 2022).”

    From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Green et al., 2021

    The Results section (page not provided) reports significant gains in communication, decision-making, and problem-solving skills for students in the intervention group. The intervention described in the paper is the SPARK Child Mentoring program, however; our copy does not establish that it is the SBM program named in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SBM program improved mental health.

    “mental health (Crooks et al., 2017; Meltzer et al. (2020); Green et al.,2021, 2022;)”

    From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Green et al., 2021

    The Results sections on emotional regulation and resilience report significant improvements among children who received the SPARK Child Mentoring program. The paper describes SPARK as a school-based social and emotional learning program, but it does not report a direct measure of mental health or establish that school-based mentoring programs generally improve it. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SBM program increased resiliency.

    “resiliency (Green et al., 2021, 2022)”
  • Among the studies reviewed, significant positive outcomes were observed even with short mentoring durations of 3 to 9 months.

    “In contrast, among the studies we reviewed, significant positive outcomes were observed even with short mentoring durations of 3 to 9months (e.g., Green et al., 2021; Simões and Alarcão, 2014; Meltzer et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prince-Embury, S. (2007). Resiliency scales for children and adolescents: A profile of personal strengths. San Antonio, TX, Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, A. L., Ferrante, S., Boaz, T. L., Kutash, K., & Wheeldon-Reece, B.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Amy L.
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2021-08-17
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
531-547
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W3194591695
Cited by
38
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
social-emotional learning, resilience, elementary school students, emotion regulation, communication skills, decision-making, problem solving, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, adverse childhood experiences, program efficacy, preventive interventions
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Child, Curriculum, Emotions, Humans, Schools, Students, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review