Cited by 43Psychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

When is unconditional self-acceptance a better predictor of mental health than self-esteem?

Popov, Stanislava·2019·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-018-0310-x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popov, S.
Affiliations
Educons University (RS)
Corresponding author
Popov, Stanislava
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
OpenAlex
W2901611738
Cited by
43
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
unconditional self-acceptance, self-esteem, mental health, positive affectivity, negative affectivity, subjective well-being, state anxiety, depressive state, rational emotive behavior therapy, Big Five personality traits, university students, predictors of mental health, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, PANAS-X

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review