The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Minimizing total weighted tardiness on a single machine with release dates and equal-length jobs
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we study the problem of scheduling n jobs with release dates, due dates, weights, and equal processing times on a single machine. The objective is to minimize total weighted tardiness. We formulate the problem as a time-indexed ILP after which we solve the LP-relaxation. We show that for certain special cases (namely when either all due dates, all weights, or all release dates are equal, or when all due dates and release dates are equally ordered), the solution for the LP-relaxation is either integral or can be adjusted in polynomial time into an integral one. For the general case we present a branching rule that performs well. Furthermore we show that the same approach holds for the m identical, parallel machines variant of the problem. Finally we show that with a minor modification the same approach also holds for the single-machine problems of minimizing the sum of weighted late jobs (1|r j ,p j =p|∑w j U j ) and the sum of weighted late work (1|r j ,p j =p|∑w j V j ) as well as their respective variants with m identical, parallel machines. We further show how we can solve these problems by applying column generation when there is not sufficient memory available to apply the direct ILP-approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Akturk, M. S., & Ozdemir, D. (2001). A new dominance rule to minimize total weighted tardiness with unequal release dates. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 394–412. · DOI · Paper page
- Baptiste, P. (1999). Polynomial time algorithms for minimizing the weighted number of late jobs on a single machine with equal processing times. Journal of Scheduling, 2, 245–252. · DOI
- Baptiste, P. (2000). Scheduling equal-length jobs on identical parallel machines. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 103(1–3), 21–32. · DOI
- Baptiste, P., Brucker, P., Knust, S., & Timkovsky, V. (2004). Ten notes on equal-processing-time scheduling. 4OR: Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies, 2, 111–127. · DOI
- Du, J., & Leung, J. Y. T. (1990). Minimizing total tardiness on one machine is NP-hard. Mathematics of Operations Research, 15(3), 483–495. · DOI
- Graham, R. L., Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. (1979). Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287–326. · DOI
- Lawler, E. L. (1977). A pseudopolynomial algorithm for sequencing jobs to minimize total tardiness. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 1, 331–342. · DOI
- Lenstra, J. K., Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., & Brucker, P. (1977). Complexity of machine scheduling problems. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 1, 343–362. · DOI
- Leung, J. Y.-T. (2004). Handbook of scheduling. New York: Chapmann & Hall/CRC. · DOI
- Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1988). Integer and combinatorial optimization. Wiley-interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization. New York: Wiley. · DOI
- Verma, S., & Dessouky, M. (1998). Single-machine scheduling of unit-time jobs with earliness and tardiness penalties. Mathematics of Operations Research, 23(4), 930–943. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optimization-Based Scheduling Method for Agile Earth-Observing Satellite Constellation
Cho, D.-H., Kim, J.-H., Choi, H.-L., & Ahn, J. (2018) · Journal of Aerospace Information Systems · doi:10.2514/1.i010620 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Akker, J. M., Diepen, G., & Hoogeveen, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Diepen, G.
- ORCID
- Hoogeveen, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Scheduling
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 561-576
- ISSN
- 1094-6136 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2005380783
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Scheduling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universiteit Utrecht
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Keywords
- total weighted tardiness, single machine scheduling, release dates, equal processing times, branching rules, identical parallel machines, weighted number of late jobs, column generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review