The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tensor Network States and Geometry
Open accessAbstract
Tensor network states are used to approximate ground states of local Hamiltonians on a lattice in D spatial dimensions. Different types of tensor network states can be seen to generate different geometries. Matrix product states (MPS) in D=1 dimensions, as well as projected entangled pair states (PEPS) in D>1 dimensions, reproduce the D-dimensional physical geometry of the lattice model; in contrast, the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) generates a (D+1)-dimensional holographic geometry. Here we focus on homogeneous tensor networks, where all the tensors in the network are copies of the same tensor, and argue that certain structural properties of the resulting many-body states are preconditioned by the geometry of the tensor network and are therefore largely independent of the choice of variational parameters. Indeed, the asymptotic decay of correlations in homogeneous MPS and MERA for D=1 systems is seen to be determined by the structure of geodesics in the physical and holographic geometries, respectively; whereas the asymptotic scaling of entanglement entropy is seen to always obey a simple boundary law—that is, again in the relevant geometry. This geometrical interpretation offers a simple and unifying framework to understand the structural properties of, and helps clarify the relation between, different tensor network states. In addition, it has recently motivated the branching MERA, a generalization of the MERA capable of reproducing violations of the entropic boundary law in D>1 dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
Anti de Sitter space and holography
Witten, E. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 · Cited by 13,070
Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00377-3 · Cited by 9,307
Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory
Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., & Polyakov, A. M. (1998) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9802109 · Cited by 9,307
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states
Schollwöck, U. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · Cited by 4,818
The density-matrix renormalization group
Schollwöck, U. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.259 · Cited by 3,323
Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena
Vidal, G., Latorre, J. I., Rico, E., & Kitaev, A. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.227902 · Cited by 2,793
Self-citationFinitely correlated states on quantum spin chains
Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., & Werner, R. F. (1992) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099178 · Cited by 1,422
Entanglement renormalization and holography
Swingle, B. (2012) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 · Cited by 915
Cited by
Orús, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · Cited by 2,255
Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., Swingle, B., & Zhao, Y. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.191301 · Cited by 852
Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 · Cited by 802
Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems
Cirac, J. I., Pérez-García, D., Schuch, N., & Verstraete, F. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.045003 · Cited by 769
Time evolution of entanglement entropy from black hole interiors
Hartman, T., & Maldacena, J. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2013)014 · Cited by 761
Metadata
- Authors
- Evenbly, G., & Vidal, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Physics
- Published
- 2011-06-11
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 891-918
- ISSN
- 0022-4715 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9613
- OpenAlex
- W2002485180
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tensor Network States and Geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10955-011-0237-4
- The paper
- Evenbly, G., & Vidal, G. (2011). Tensor Network States and Geometry. Journal of Statistical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-011-0237-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.