Alignment of Hands-on STEM Engagement Activities with Positive STEM Dispositions in Secondary School Students
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very few studies had investigated the prominence use of robots in various and large-scale multidiscipline studies.
“very few studies had investigated the prominence use of robots in various and large-scale multidiscipline studies (e.g., Christensen etal., 2015).”
From Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model (2023) · cites this paper as Christensen et al., 2015
Cites
Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012702 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Liang, J.-C. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Until that point, very few studies had investigated the prominence use of robots in various and large-scale multidiscipline studies (e.g., Christensen et al., 2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Christensen, Rhonda
- Venue
- Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Published
- 2015-06-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 898-909
- ISSN
- 1059-0145 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1839
- OpenAlex
- W596993669
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Science Education and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1312168)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- junior high school students, high school students, energy consumption monitoring, STEM career interest, gender differences, STEM engagement, STEM education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
