Cited by 7Online and Blended LearningIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningVarious Chemistry Research Topics

Students’ Perceptions on the Impact of Online Homework Systems on Their Performance in a General Chemistry Course

Tang, Diya, Odeleye, Oluwatobi·2023·Journal of Science Education and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10956-023-10061-0

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, D., & Odeleye, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Diya
Venue
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published
2023-07-10
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
710-721
ISSN
  • 1059-0145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1839
OpenAlex
W4383683124
Cited by
7
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Science Education and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
Keywords
online homework systems, student perceptions, general chemistry, ALEKS, young trees, adaptive learning systems, homework effectiveness, exam preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review