The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed
Open accessAbstract
University–Industry Collaboration networks are increasingly significant to national economies. Previous studies have identified barriers and enablers of University–Industry Collaborations, however our understanding of the evolution of such collaborations is still limited thereby restricting our ability to nurture their development. This study explores the establishment of a successful University–Industry Collaboration and considers a range of perceived barriers and enablers through four emergent evolutionary phases:embryonic, initiation, engagement and established. The study adopted a qualitative research approach using a single site case study, focusing on the pharmaceutical industry, with 10 multinational firms and 8 academic institutions involved in a pharmaceutical collaboration. The results demonstrate that specific University–Industry Collaboration barriers and enablers emerge at different points in time, for example, strong lack of trust; strong fear of knowledge leakage, reluctance to share in the embryonic phase evolve to achieving integrity based trust and an intellectual property agreement in the engagement phase. These barriers were overcome using a range of phase appropriate mechanisms, for example, prior experience of the partners was critical in the embryonic phase, while cohesiveness and knowledge complementarity were vital in the engagement phase. The study emphasizes the significance of public funding and its distribution among members in order to support industry evolution and competitiveness. The University–Industry Collaboration continues to attract new participants and additional network-specific investments and has become a global centre of excellence for pharmaceutical research and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Building a Network Theory of Social Capital
Lin, N. (2017) · Social Capital · doi:10.4324/9781315129457-1 · Cited by 3,807
Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case
Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::aid-smj96>3.0.co;2-n · Cited by 3,548
The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083026 · Cited by 3,226
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
Gulati, R. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199905)20:5<397::aid-smj35>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 2,482
Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273 · Cited by 2,269
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 · Cited by 2,224
Cited by
Romero-Sánchez, A., Perdomo-Charry, G., & Burbano-Vallejo, E. L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27258 · Cited by 43
Educational Innovation Transforming Higher Education for Workforce Readiness
Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024) · Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0517-1.ch003 · Cited by 14
Technology transfer as a catalyst for effective university-industry collaboration in Botswana
Mafu, M. (2023) · African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development · doi:10.1080/20421338.2023.2173403 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Dwyer, M., Filieri, R., & O’Malley, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Technology Transfer
- Published
- 2022-03-30
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 900-931
- ISSN
- 0892-9912 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7047
- OpenAlex
- W4220765533
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 45.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2
- The paper
- O’Dwyer, M., Filieri, R., & O’Malley, L. (2023). Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.