The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the entrepreneurial landscape of university-industry collaboration on public university spin-off creation: A systematic literature review
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Research into the factors influencing university-industry collaboration on public university spin-offs creation has focused on management, entrepreneurship, technology and innovation. This research began with a careful systematic literature review of 4427 scientific papers published in the last ten years (2014-2023) and accessible in the prestigious Web of Science core collection. A quantitative methodology was used, complemented by the use of the visual analysis tool Posit PBC™, formerly known as R Cloud Studio. This comprehensive approach facilitated the seamless ingestion of raw data into Biblioshyni, which is a web-based platform specialised in bibliometric analysis. This review has revealed compelling trends, particularly in terms of increasing diversity, the emergence of United Kingdom as a major player, and the central role of university-industry collaboration. Our systematic review identified influential authors in the field, including the prolific contributions of scholars such as D. Radicid, S. Ropers, Y. Li and R. Owen. We also identified important research institutions, such as Utrecht University in Netherlands, Lund University in Sweden and The University of Manchester in the UK. In addition, we have shown that countries such as the United Kingdom, China and USA have made a significant contribution to the volume of publications. The results highlighted a marked increase in the phenomenon of univeristy spin-offs over the past decade, as evidenced by the exponential growth in both publication output and citation rates. This empirical revelation was underpinned by a rigorous exploration of the Web of Science database, using a carefully crafted set of keywords. Thirty-seven pivotal studies were selected for in-depth review through a sophisticated selection process that adhered to the rigorous standards of the PRISMA methodology. The aim of this review is to improve understanding and encourage deeper exploration of spin-off-based public universities through collaboration between academia and industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
![Fig. 1 Diagram of the PRISMA statement and the steps involved in identifying bibliographic data and refining searches. Source: Modified from Haddaway et al. [47].](/paper-figures/e28298236a8d471a8757008f6d504b93/exploring-the-entrepreneurial-landscape-of-university-industry-collaboration-on-figure-1.jpg)










Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064 · cited 3×
“In addition to considering various alternative approaches, we introduced a pioneering methodology by incorporating Bibliome-trix ® - an open-source R package thoughtfully designed by Aria and Cuccurullo [49].”
BackgroundMethodHow to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1230 · Cited by 3,486
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 · Cited by 2,909
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., et al. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 · Cited by 2,552
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y · Cited by 2,114
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · Revista Española de Cardiología · doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 · Cited by 2,095
Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 · Cited by 1,801
Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations
Etzkowitz, H. (2003) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 · Cited by 1,687
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Eshackathon, 2020, R package and Shiny App for making PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams, An Event Series to Develop Open Software for Evidence Synthesis 2022
- Kör, 2017, vol. 46, 18
- Perdomo Charry, 2022, How a network-based start-up ecosystem supports new venture performance: management perspectives and future research, Int. J. Enterpren., 26, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Romero-Sánchez, A., Perdomo-Charry, G., & Burbano-Vallejo, E. L.
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- e27258
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11489156
- OpenAlex
- W4392380603
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Library (University of San Buenaventura Colombia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Demography › Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
- Keywords
- university spin-offs, university-industry collaboration, university entrepreneurship, public universities, technology transfer, innovation, bibliometric analysis, research trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the entrepreneurial landscape of university-industry collaboration on public university spin-off creation: A systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27258
- The paper
- Romero-Sánchez, A., Perdomo-Charry, G., & Burbano-Vallejo, E. L. (2024). Exploring the entrepreneurial landscape of university-industry collaboration on public university spin-off creation: A systematic literature review. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.