Cited by 25Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCultural Differences and Values

The social values of aggressive–prosocial youth

McDonald, Kristina L., Benish-Weisman, Maya, O’Brien, Christopher T., Ungvary, Stephen·2015·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Recent research has identified youth who utilize both aggressive and prosocial behavior with peers. Although the social values and motivations associated with aggression and prosocial behavior have been well studied, the values of youth who utilize both aggression and prosocial behavior are unknown. The current study identified groups of adolescents based on peer nominations of aggression and prosocial behavior from both Israel (n = 569; 56.94% Arab, 43.06% Jewish; 53.78% female) and the United States (n = 342; 67.54% African-American; 32.46% European-American; 50.88% female). Self-enhancement, self-transcendence, openness-to-change, and conservation values predicted behavioral group membership. Power values predicted membership in the aggressive group relative to the aggressive-prosocial, prosocial, and low-both groups. For Israeli boys, openness-to-change values predicted membership in the aggressive-prosocial group relative to the prosocial group. The values of aggressive-prosocial youth were more similar to the values of prosocial peers than to aggressive peers, suggesting that motivational interventions for aggressive-prosocial youth should differ in important ways than those for aggressive youth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-014-0246-0

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contrary to previous peer-nomination studies, no evidence for mainly aggressive or mainly prosocial groups was found.

    “Contrary to previous works that looked for profiles using peer-nomination to collect data (e.g., Berger et al., 2015 ; Hartl et al., 2019 ; McDonald et al., 2015 ), no evidence for mainly aggressive 1 or mainly prosocial groups was found.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, K. L., Benish-Weisman, M., O’Brien, C. T., & Ungvary, S.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
McDonald, Kristina L.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2015-01-06
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
2245-2256
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2110272190
Cited by
25
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
aggression, prosocial behavior, social values, self-enhancement, self-transcendence, openness to change, power values, conservation value, peer nominations, adolescents, cross-cultural comparison, Israel, United States
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Aggression, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Israel, Male, Peer Group, Social Behavior, Social Values, United States, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review