Cited by 39Media Influence and HealthMedia Studies and CommunicationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Preadolescents’ Emotional and Prosocial Responses to Negative TV News: Investigating the Beneficial Effects of Constructive Reporting and Peer Discussion

Open access
Kleemans, Mariska, Schlindwein, Luise F., Dohmen, Roos·2017·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Watching news is important for preadolescents, but it may also harm their well-being. This study examined whether applying insights from positive psychology to news production can reduce this potential harm, by reducing negative emotional responses and enhancing positive emotional responses to negative news, and by encouraging prosocial intentions. Moreover, we explored whether peer discussion strengthened these effects. Preadolescents (n = 336; 9-13 years old; 48.5% female) were exposed to either constructive (solution-based news including positive emotions) or nonconstructive news. Subsequently, half of the children assigned to the constructive and the nonconstructive condition participated in a peer discussion. The findings showed that exposure to constructive news resulted in more positive emotional responses and less negative emotional responses as compared to nonconstructive news. Moreover, discussing the news with peers led to more positive and less negative emotional responses among preadolescents who watched the nonconstructive newscast, and to more prosocial intentions among preadolescents who watched constructive news. In all, constructive news reporting and peer discussion could function as tools to make negative news less harmful for preadolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-017-0675-7

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that negative emotional responses to negative news can be mitigated by constructive news reporting and peer discussion.

    “There is some evidence to suggest that negative emotional responses to negative news can be mitigated by constructive news reporting and peer discussion [168].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McIntyre, K. E. (2015). Constructive journalism: The effects of positive emotions and solution information in news stories (Doctoral dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleemans, M., Schlindwein, L. F., & Dohmen, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Kleemans, Mariska
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
2060-2072
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2605748731
Cited by
39
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
41.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
preadolescents, negative news, television news, positive emotions, negative emotions, prosocial intentions, peer discussion, news exposure, positive psychology, child well-being
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Anxiety, Child, Child Behavior, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Social Environment, Television

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review