Cited by 8Youth Education and Societal DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in patterns of social role combinations at ages 25-26 among those growing up in England between 1996 and 2015-16: evidence from the 1970 British Cohort and Next Steps Studies

Open access
Gagné, Thierry, Sacker, Amanda, Schoon, Ingrid·2021·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Changes across education, employment, and family life over the past 20 years challenges the capacity of previously established social role combinations to continue representing the experiences of young men and women born since the late 1980s. Latent class analysis was used to derive patterns of role combinations at ages 25–26 in those growing up in England, using data from 3191 men and 3921 women in the 1970 British Cohort Study (1996) and 3426 men and 4281 women in the Next Steps study born in 1989–90 (2015–16). Role combinations in 1996 were well defined by five patterns across genders: educated, work-oriented, traditional family, fragile family, and slow starters. Patterns in 2015–16 diverged across genders (e.g., disappearance of home ownership in the traditional family group among men and higher education as a group identifier among women) and included across genders fewer work-oriented, more slow starters, and a new group of “left behind” who are excluded from work and relationships. Young men and women born around 1990 experienced diverging role combinations characterized by increased delays and inequalities, with fewer being able to attain the milestones traditionally associated with the transition to adulthood by the mid-20s.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-021-01477-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests delayed onset of sexual activity, delayed and reduced use of alcohol and illicit drugs except in marginalised groups, and a trend to slower maturation, including if and when economic independence is attained.

    “Evidence suggests delayed onset of sexual activity, delayed and reduced use of alcohol and illicit drugs except in marginalised groups, and a trend to slower maturation, including if and when economic independence is attained.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) reports more young adults delaying independent living, alongside declines in full-time employment and home ownership. This supports the economic-independence part of the claim. The paper does not address delayed sexual activity or changes in alcohol and illicit-drug use, including the proposed exception for marginalised groups. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Amato, P. R., Landale, N. S., Havasevich, T. C., Booth, A., Eggebeen, D. J., & Schoen, R. (2008). Precursors of young women’s family formation pathways. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70(5), 1271–1286. · DOI
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens to the late twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Benson, J. E., & Elder, Jr, G. H. (2011). Young adult identities and their pathways: a development and life course model. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1646–1657. · DOI
  4. Billari, F. C., Hiekel, N., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2019). The social stratification of choice in the transition to adulthood. European Sociological Review, 35(5), 599–615. · DOI
  5. Billari, F. C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research, 15(2–3), 181–198.
  6. Buchmann, M. (1989). The script of life in modern society: entry into adulthood in a changing world. University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bynner, J. (2005). Rethinking the youth phase of the life-course: the case for emerging adulthood? Journal of Youth Studies, 8(4), 367–384. · DOI
  8. Chamberlain, G., University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Chamberlain, R. (2013). 1970 British Cohort Study: Birth and 22-Month Subsample, 1970–1972. [data collection]. 3rd Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 2666, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-2666-2. · DOI
  9. Crisp, R., & Powell, R. (2017). Young people and UK labour market policy: a critique of ‘employability’ as a tool for understanding youth unemployment. Urban Studies, 54(8), 1784–1807. · DOI
  10. Côté, J., & Bynner, J. (2008). Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: the role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 251–268. · DOI
  11. Côté, J. (2014). The dangerous myth of emerging adulthood: an evidence-based critique of a flawed developmental theory. Applied Developmental Science, 18(4), 177–188. · DOI
  12. Elliott, J., & Shepherd, P. (2006). Cohort profile: 1970 British Birth Cohort (BCS70). International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(4), 836–43. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Eliason, S. R., Mortimer, J. T., & Vuolo, M. (2015). The transition to adulthood: life course structures and subjective perceptions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(3), 205–227. · DOI
  14. Finch, N. (2008). Family Policies in the UK.Family Policies in the Context of Family Change. In: I. Ostner C. Schmitt, (eds.) The Nordic Countries in Comparative Perspective. (pp. 130–154). Netherlands: Verlag.
  15. Furlong, A. (2006). Not a very NEET solution. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 553–569. · DOI
  16. Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2007). Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  17. Green, M. J. (2014). Latent class analysis was accurate but sensitive in data simulations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(10), 1157–1162. · DOI
  18. Hogan, D. P., & Astone, N. M. (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 109–130. · DOI
  19. MacMillan, R., & Copher, R. (2005). Families in the life course: interdependency of roles, role configurations, and pathways. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67(4), 858–879. · DOI
  20. MacMillan, R. & Eliason, S. R. (2003). Characterizing the life course as role configurations and pathways. A latent structure approach. Chapter 24. In: J. T. Mortimer M. Shanahan, (eds.) Handbook of the life course. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  21. Maggs, J. L., Jager, J., Patrick, M. E., & Schulenberg, J. (2012). Social role patterning in early adulthood in the USA: adolescent predictors and concurrent wellbeing across four distinct configurations. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(2), 190–210. · DOI
  22. Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E., ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update, 17(6), 848–860. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.
  24. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Oesterle, S., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., & Bailey, J. A. (2010). Men’s and women’s pathways to adulthood and their adolescent precursors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(5), 1436–1453. · DOI
  26. Ross, A., Schoon, I., Martin, P., & Sacker, A. (2009). Family and nonfamily role configurations in two British cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71(1), 1–14. · DOI
  27. Salmela-Aro, K., Taanila, A., & Chen, M. (2012). Role configurations in young adulthood, antecedents, and later wellbeing among Finns born in 1966. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(2), 228–242.
  28. Schoon, I., Bynner, J. (2019). Young people and the Great Recession: Variations in the school-to-work transition in Europe and the United States. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 10(2), 153-173. · DOI
  29. Schoon, I. (2015). Gender and the transition to adulthood: a diverse pathways view. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Coll.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0138. · DOI
  30. Schoon, I., & Bynner, J. (Eds.) (2017). Young people’s development and the great recession: uncertain transitions and precarious futures. Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  31. Schoon, I., Chen, M., Kneale, D., & Jager, J. (2012). Becoming adults in Britain: lifestyles and wellbeing in times of social change. Longitudinal and Lifecourse Studies, 3(2), 173–189.
  32. Schoon, I., & Lyons-Amos, M. (2016). Diverse pathways in becoming an adult: the role of structure, agency and context. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 46(Part A), 11–20. · DOI
  33. Schoon, I., & Lyons-Amos, M. (2017). A socio-ecological model of agency: the role of structure and agency in shaping education and employment transitions in England. Longitudinal and Lifecourse Studies, 8(1), 35–56.
  34. Settersten, R.A. Jr, Furstenberg, F.F., & Rumbaut R.G. (Eds.). (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: theory, research, and public policy. University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  35. Shanahan, M. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692. · DOI
  36. Shanahan, M. J., Porfeli, E. J., Mortimer, J. T., & Erickson, L. D. (2005). Subjective age identity and the transiton to adulthood: when do adolescents become adults? In R. A. Settersten, Jr, F. F. Furstenberg & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood. Theory, research and public policy (pp. 225–255). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  37. Sironi, M. (2018). Economic conditions of young adults before and after the great recession. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39(1), 103–116. · DOI
  38. StataCorp (2019). Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
  39. Studer, M., Liefbroer, A. C., & Mooyaart, J. E. (2018). Understanding trends in family formation trajectories: an application of Competing Trajectories Analysis (CTA). Advances in Life Course Research, 36, 1–12. · DOI
  40. University College London, UCL Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2018). Next Steps: Sweeps 1–8, 2004–2016. [data collection]. 14th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 5545, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5545-6. · DOI
  41. University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Bynner, J. (2016). 1970 British cohort study: twenty-six-year follow-up, 1996. [data collection]. 5th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 3833, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-3833-3. · DOI
  42. Vespa, J. (2017). The changing economics and demographics of young adulthood: 1976–2016. Current Population Reports, 0, 1–23.
  43. Winkler-Dworak, M., & Toulemon, X. (2007). Gender differences in the transition to adulthood in France: is there convergence over the recent period? European Journal of Population, 23, 273–314. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gagné, T., Sacker, A., & Schoon, I.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gagné, Thierry
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2021-07-16
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
2052-2066
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W3182917408
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V01577X/1, ES/R008930/1, ES/J019135/1, ES/F037104/1, ES/T001526/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
coming of age, gender differences, educational attainment, employment, family life, homeownership, cohort change, 1970 British Cohort Study, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Status, Employment, England, Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Social Class, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review