The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction
Abstract
Using a framework of assessment literacy that included teachers’ view of learning, knowledge of assessment tools, and knowledge of assessment interpretation and action taking, this study explored the assessment literacy of five experienced middle school teachers. Multiple sources of data were: teachers’ predictions about students’ ideas, students’ written and verbal responses to assessment tasks, teacher background questionnaire, and a videotaped teacher focus group. We investigated middle school teachers’ predictions, interpretations, and recommended actions for formative assessment in genetics. Results documented a variety of ways that teachers would elicit students’ ideas in genetics, focusing on discussion strategies. Findings showed how well teachers predicted student conceptions compared to actual student conceptions. We also found that teachers mostly described general topics they would use to address students’ alternative conceptions. Less often, they explained specific content they would use to challenge ideas or pedagogical strategies for conceptual change. Teachers also discussed barriers to addressing ideas. Teacher professional development should provide more support in helping teachers close the formative assessment cycle by addressing conceptions that are elicited with assessments.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies found assessment literacy to be important for AfL”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Gottheiner & Siegel, 2012
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the use of formative assessment requires knowledge and skills related to constructing and using a range of assessment instruments, such as paper-and-pencil tests and homework assignments”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Gottheiner & Siegel, 2012
In the citing paper
“and the knowledge and skills to critically evaluate these assessment instruments”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Gottheiner & Siegel, 2012
In the citing paper
“Gottheiner and Siegel (2012), for example, found that teachers must have knowledge of common misconceptions within the subject.”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Gottheiner and Siegel (2012)
Citations
Cites
Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings
(2002) · doi:10.1353/book4583 · Cited by 3,502
The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture
Shepard, L. A. (2000) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x029007004 · Cited by 2,161 · cited 2×
“A teacher’s assessment philosophy is based on and connected to a teacher’s view of student learning (Pellegrino et al. 2001; Shepard 2000).”
BackgroundPreparing for the Plunge: Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Literacy
Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- AbellSKAbellSKLedermanNGResearch on science teacher knowledgeHandbook of research on science education2007Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum11051149
- Abell S. K. & Siegel M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In D. Corrigan J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.) The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205–221). London UK: Springer. · DOI
- BellBAbellSKLedermanNGClassroom assessment of science learningHandbook of research on science education2007Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum11051149
- BellBCowieBFormative assessment in science education2001The NetherlandsKluwer
- 10.1002/tea.3660280103 · DOI
- BlackPAtkinJMCoffeyJEThe importance of everyday assessmentEveryday assessment in the classroom2003Arlington, VANational Science Teachers Association Press112
- Science content standards for California1998Sacramento, CACalifornia State Board
- CareyMAMorseJThe group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group researchCritical issues in qualitative research methods1994Thousand Oaks, CASage225241
- 10.1080/00219266.1978.9654169 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.3730760504 · DOI
- Ed-Data. (2002). Fiscal demographic and performance data on California’s K-12 schools. In Alameda County Office of Education California Department of Education Edsource and Fiscal Crisis of Management Assistance Team (Eds.) Education data partnership (online). Available: http://www.ed-data.kI2.ca.us/welcome.asp May 10 2004.
- 10.1080/00219266.1985.9654757 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781412990028 · DOI
- 10.1080/10627197.2006.9652990 · DOI
- HatchJADoing qualitative research in education settings2002New YorkState University of New York Press
- HuntEBMinstrellJMcGillyKA cognitive approach to the teaching of physicsClassroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice1994CambridgeMIT Press/Bradford Books
- 10.1080/00219266.1980.10668980 · DOI
- 10.1080/0950069980200303 · DOI
- KreugerRACaseyMAFocus group interviews: A practical guide for applied research2000Thousand Oaks, CASage
- LanninJAbellSArbaughFChvalKFriedrichsenPVolkmannMResearching teacher knowledge: Further delineating the PCK construct for science and mathematics education2008New York, NYAmerican Educational Research Association
- MagnussonSJBorkoHKrajcikJSGess-NewsomeJLedennanNNature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teachingExamining pedagogical content knowledge1999Boston, MAKluwer95132
- MertlerCAAssessing student performance: A descriptive study of the classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachersEducation1999120285296
- 10.1002/sce.10092 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.20073 · DOI
- National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
- PattonMQQualitative research and evaluation methods20023Thousand Oaks, CASage
- PellegrinoJWChudowskyNGlaserRKnowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment2001Washington, DCNational Academy Press
- 10.1080/02635140120046240 · DOI
- PophamWJClassroom assessment: What teachers need to know1999Boston, MAAllyn & Bacon
- 10.1002/tea.20163 · DOI
- SmithDCNealeDCBrophyJThe construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teachingAdvances in research on teaching1991Greenwich, CTJAI Press187243
- Stiggins R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning (electronic version). Kappan.http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0206sti.htm. · DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.02-03-0007 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10972-007-9084-1 · DOI
Cited by
Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis Hillel Day School655 Brotherhood Way94132-2901San FranciscoCAUSA
- University of Missouri (US)
- ORCID
- Siegel, Marcelle A.
- Venue
- Journal of Science Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 531-557
- ISSN
- 1046-560X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1847
- OpenAlex
- W2072379502
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Science Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Keywords
- assessment literacy, middle school science teachers, genetics education, student conceptions, misconceptions, formative assessment, conceptual change, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
- The paper
- Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.