The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retributive and restorative justice.
Abstract
The emergence of restorative justice as an alternative model to Western, court-based criminal justice may have important implications for the psychology of justice. It is proposed that two different notions of justice affect responses to rule-breaking: restorative and retributive justice. Retributive justice essentially refers to the repair of justice through unilateral imposition of punishment, whereas restorative justice means the repair of justice through reaffirming a shared value-consensus in a bilateral process. Among the symbolic implications of transgressions, concerns about status and power are primarily related to retributive justice and concerns about shared values are primarily related to restorative justice. At the core of these processes, however, lies the parties' construal of their identity relation, specifically whether or not respondents perceive to share an identity with the offender. The specific case of intergroup transgressions is discussed, as are implications for future research on restoring a sense of justice after rule-breaking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,091
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,159
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
The division of labor in society
Durkheim, É. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.4324/9780429499838-5 · Cited by 5,156
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,690
Crime, Shame and Reintegration
Braithwaite, J. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804618 · Cited by 4,153
Cited by
Garner, A., Yogman, M., COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD AND FAMILY HEALTH, Lavin, A., Askew, G. L., Baum, R. A., Berger-Jenkins, E., Johnson, T. J., Jutte, D., Nasir, A. A., et al. (2021) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2021-052582 · Cited by 392
Designing fair AI for managing employees in organizations: a review, critique, and design agenda
Robert, L. P., Pierce, C., Marquis, L., Kim, S., & Alahmad, R. (2020) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1735391 · Cited by 268
Social Justice: History, Theory, and Research
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002030 · Cited by 253
Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005 · Cited by 205
Stories of injustice: Towards a narrative victimology
Pemberton, A., Mulder, E., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2019) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370818770843 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J.
- Venue
- Law and Human Behavior
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 375-389
- ISSN
- 0147-7307 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-661X
- OpenAlex
- W1964285061
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 126
- FWCI
- 142.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retributive and restorative justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
- The paper
- Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
