The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions.
Abstract
We hypothesised that the responses of pairs of liars would correspond less with each other than would responses of pairs of truth tellers, but only when the responses are given to unanticipated questions. Liars and truth tellers were interviewed individually about having had lunch together in a restaurant. The interviewer asked typical opening questions which we expected the liars to anticipate, followed by questions about spatial and/or temporal information which we expected suspects not to anticipate, and also a request to draw the layout of the restaurant. The results supported the hypothesis, and based on correspondence in responses to the unanticipated questions, up to 80% of liars and truth tellers could be correctly classified, particularly when assessing drawings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674433014 · Cited by 3,447
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
Criminal Justice and Behavior: An Editorial Retrospective
Brodsky, S. L. (1980) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/009385488000700401 · Cited by 1,723
Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing
(1994) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4561.001.0001 · Cited by 1,720
Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities
Vrij, A. (2008) · Cited by 1,355
Self-citation(1992) · Cited by 1,155
The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.
Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.332 · Cited by 517
The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues
Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x · Cited by 515
Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y · Cited by 498
Self-citation
Cited by
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1107.4557 · Cited by 1,008
Pitfalls and Opportunities in Nonverbal and Verbal Lie Detection
Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100610390861 · Cited by 522
Self-citationEliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked.
Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004 · Cited by 313
Self-citationDetecting deception in suspects: verbal cues as a function of interview strategy
Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L., Wolf, A. G., Vrij, A., & Hjelmsäter, E. R. A. (2011) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/10683160903446982 · Cited by 50
Self-citationThe Role of Consistency in Detecting Deception: The Superiority of Correspondence over Coherence
Blair, J. P., Reimer, T. O., & Levine, T. R. (2018) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2018.1447492 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K.
- Venue
- Law and Human Behavior
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-166
- ISSN
- 0147-7307 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-661X
- OpenAlex
- W2075471878
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 16.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y
- The paper
- Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., & Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.