Cited by 99Risk Perception and ManagementDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition.

Open access
Kahan, Dan M., Braman, Donald, Cohen, Geoffrey L., Gastil, John, Slovic, Paul·2010·Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The cultural cognition thesis holds that individuals form risk perceptions that reflect their commitments to contested views of the good society. We conducted a study that used the dispute over mandatory HPV vaccination to test the cultural cognition thesis. Although public health officials have recommended that all girls aged 11 or 12 be vaccinated for HPV-a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer-political controversy has blocked adoption of mandatory school-enrollment vaccination programs in all but one state. An experimental study of a large sample of American adults (N = 1,538) found that cultural cognition generates disagreement about the risks and benefits of the vaccine through two mechanisms: biased assimilation, and the credibility heuristic. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10979-009-9201-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The different polarity of the associations with vaccination is consonant with the notion that libertarians object to the government intrusion arising from mandatory vaccination programs, whereas people low on conservatism may oppose immunization because they distrust pharmaceutical companies.

    “The different polarity of those associations is consonant with the notion that libertarians object to the government intrusion arising from mandatory vaccination programs [15], whereas people low on conservatism—who, by implication, are liberal or progressive—may oppose immunization because they distrust pharmaceutical companies [40].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 99

Authors
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Cohen, G. L., Gastil, J., & Slovic, P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2010-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
501-516
ISSN
  • 0147-7307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-661X
OpenAlex
W2119950659
Cited by
99
References
88
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Law and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
cultural cognition, HPV vaccine, mandatory vaccination, risk perception, biased assimilation, cervical cancer prevention, political conflict, public health policy, vaccine hesitancy
MeSH terms
Cognition, Culture, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, United States, Risk Assessment, Mandatory Programs, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review