CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity

Sahraoui, Yohan, Foltête, Jean-Christophe, Clauzel, Céline·2017·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Baillie J, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment · DOI
  2. Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278 · DOI
  3. Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RG, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37(5):771–788 · DOI
  5. Clauzel C, Bannwarth C, Foltete J-C (2015) Integrating regional-scale connectivity in habitat restoration: an application for amphibian conservation in eastern France. J Nat Conserv 23:98–107 · DOI
  6. Clauzel C, Girardet X, Foltête J-C (2013) Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. J Environ Manag 127:125–134 · DOI
  7. Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15:396–406 · DOI
  8. Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Ecol Modell 231:101–112 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American Great Plains. Biodivers Conserv 22:2583–2605 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dunford W, Freemark K (2005) Matrix matters: effects of Surrounding Land Uses on Forest Birds Near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecol 20:497–511 · DOI
  11. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61:603–610 · DOI
  13. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Foltête J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G (2012) A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environ Model Softw 38:316–327 · DOI
  16. Foltete J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G, Tournant P (2012) Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landscape Ecol 27:557–569 · DOI
  17. Foltête J-C, Girardet X, Clauzel C (2014) A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning. Landsc Urban Plan 124:140–150 · DOI
  18. Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · DOI · Paper page
  19. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fu W, Liu S, Degloria SD, Dong S, Beazley R (2010) Characterizing the “fragmentation–barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: A case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landsc Urban Plann 95(3):122–129 · DOI
  21. Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Geneletti D (2006) Some common shortcomings in the treatment of impacts of linear infrastructures on natural habitat. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:257–267 · DOI
  23. Giplin M, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London
  24. Girardet X, Foltête J-C, Clauzel C (2013) Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures. Environ Impact Assess Rev 42:10–17 · DOI
  25. Goetz SJ, Jantz P, Jantz CA (2009) Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: parks and protected areas in a landscape context. Remote Sens Environ 113:1421–1429 · DOI
  26. Gurrutxaga M, Rubio L, Saura S (2011) Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: a transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landsc Urban Plan 101:310–320 · DOI
  27. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758 · DOI
  28. Hirzel AH, Helfer V, Metral F (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol Modell 145:111–121 · DOI
  29. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G (2008) Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol 45:1372–1381 · DOI
  30. Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856 · DOI
  31. Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Szekely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605 · DOI
  32. Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy SA, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26(1):29–38 · DOI
  33. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington
  34. Mimet A, Clauzel C, Foltête J-C (2016) Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0373-y · DOI
  35. Minor ES, Lookingbill TR (2010) A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States. Conserv Biol 24:1549–1558 · DOI
  36. Nathan R (2001) The challenges of studying dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 16:481–483 · DOI
  37. Opdam P, Pouwels R, Steingröver S, Vos C (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: introducing ecoprofiles. Ecol Soc 13:20 · DOI
  38. Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ (2002) Modeling large-scale dispersal distances. Ecol Model 151:279–292 · DOI
  39. Pereira M, Segurado P, Neves N (2011) Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: a case study with pond turtles. Landsc Urban Plan 100:67–76 · DOI
  40. Pontius RG, Shusas E, McEachern M (2004) Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:251–268 · DOI
  41. Rayfield B, Fortin MJ, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Vedder A, Coppolillo PB, Ward SE (2002) A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landsc Urban Plan 58:41–56 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103 · DOI
  45. Saura S, Vogt P, Velásquez J, Hernando A, Tejera R (2011) Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. For Ecol Manag 262:150–160 · DOI
  46. Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128 · DOI
  47. Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SK, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84(12):3403 · DOI
  48. Solé RV, Bascompte J (2006) Self-organization in complex ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton · DOI
  49. Sutherland G, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4(1):16 · DOI
  50. Tannier C, Bourgeois M, Houot H, Foltête J (2016) Land Use Policy Impact of urban developments on the functional connectivity of forested habitats: a joint contribution of advanced urban models and landscape graphs. Land Use Policy 52:76–91 · DOI
  51. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–43 · DOI
  52. Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218 · DOI
  53. Vasas V, Magura T, Jordan F, Tothmeresz B (2009) Graph theory in action: evaluating planned highway tracks based on connectivity measures. Landscape Ecol 24:581–586 · DOI
  54. Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol 22:171–177 · DOI
  55. Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PF, Ter Braak CJ (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 157:24–41 · DOI
  56. Yager R (1977) Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets. Int J Man Mach Stud 9:375–382 · DOI
  57. Zeller KA, Mcgarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Zetterberg A, Mortberg UM, Balfors B (2010) Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landsc Urban Plan 95:181–191 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sahraoui, Y., Foltête, J.-C., & Clauzel, C.
ORCID
Sahraoui, Yohan
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-07-19
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1819-1835
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6
Cited by
98
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Funders
European FEDER funds (35446)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review